Implicating knotting → knot
Link to implication

Reason:

Peekaboo said:
I disagree, two characters can be knotted without the knot actually being showed.

^^ this seconded.

Yup, I didn't think in that. Ignore this, then.

EDIT: OTOH, because of the "tag what you see rule", if the knot isn't being displayed, then it shouldn't be tagged as knotting either, because there is no way to tell if they are tied.

Lizardite said:
EDIT: OTOH, because of the "tag what you see rule", if the knot isn't being displayed, then it shouldn't be tagged as knotting either, because there is no way to tell if they are tied.

Seconded.

Lizardite said:
EDIT: OTOH, because of the "tag what you see rule", if the knot isn't being displayed, then it shouldn't be tagged as knotting either, because there is no way to tell if they are tied.

That's what I thought when I mentioned the same implication a while back, but...
post #304075
...it's pretty obvious in some cases.

Denied for reasons above