Implicating bovine → mammal
Link to implication

Reason:

Bovines are mammals.

I still don't understand the need for the mammal tag, but if we've already implicated feline, canine, equine etc. this should be fine too.

-Sigh- might as well

Seven_Twenty said:
I still don't understand the need for the mammal tag, but if we've already implicated feline, canine, equine etc. this should be fine too.

people bitching about blacklisting them, instead of just blacklisting them individually.

123easy said:
people bitching about blacklisting them, instead of just blacklisting them individually.

Oh... so that's the reason behind it! :I

Seven_Twenty said:
I still don't understand the need for the mammal tag

There isn't one.

ippiki_ookami said:
There isn't one.

https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=mammal

123easy said:
https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=mammal

I think he meant the need of the tag not the tag itself.

At least it never has to be tagged manually, since the implications take care of that. So yeah, might as well.

I've actually found it to be useful in a couple of my tagging projects (tagging interspecies and predator/prey_relations, for example), though it'd be better after an another implication or two. And I expect that it's useful if someone's searching for similar stuff, fe. mammal reptile rating:e

I guess it's so that people can have a scalie only version of e6

Rainbow_Dash said:
I guess it's so that people can have a scalie only version of e6

Which makes me go "Why?" when you can just blacklist -scalie and voila...

123easy said:
Which makes me go "Why?" when you can just blacklist -scalie and voila...

But then you also lose trees, flowers, fungus and door handles.

123easy said:
Which makes me go "Why?" when you can just blacklist -scalie and voila...

*shrugs* I'm not sure, but apparently they wanted it that way