Hello, and good day. Does anyone here feel that knotted_horsecock should be a new tag? I've been helping with tag updates lately, and kinda noticed that it would certainly be appliable. For example, if you use the tag, say,
Felkin
, you would find knotted horsecocks for most of those results. Anyone else got something? For it or against it?

Can you give an example of what a knotted horsecock actually is?

Doesn't need it's own tag.
Would be like tagging "female_horse" or "blue_otter"

Sure I agree with knotted_horsecock

Why not just add knot and horsecock to the tags of the image? We don't say "knotted_canine_penis" when we see a canine penis. We put "knot" and "canine_penis" for that. That logic should be applied to this

TheHuskyK9 said:
Why not just add knot and horsecock to the tags of the image? We don't say "knotted_canine_penis" when we see a canine penis. We put "knot" and "canine_penis" for that. That logic should be applied to this

Not really, anyone with a little knowledge in anatomy knows a canine penis has a knot already so there's no need to repeat that IN canine penis, for a horsecock however...

Fluttershy said:
Not really, anyone with a little knowledge in anatomy knows a canine penis has a knot already so there's no need to repeat that IN canine penis, for a horsecock however...

Same concept. Tagging "knotted_horsecock" is just like tagging "knotted_canine_penis", it's unnecessary. We can just put knot and horsecock in the tags of the image and if users want to find horsecock with a knot, they can just search knot horsecock -canine. I've checked it, and all of Peekaboo's examples and more examples were found in that search

TheHuskyK9 said:
Same concept. Tagging "knotted_horsecock" is just like tagging "knotted_canine_penis", it's unnecessary.

Not the same concept. Already explained in my previous post.

TheHuskyK9 said:
Same concept. Tagging "knotted_horsecock" is just like tagging "knotted_canine_penis", it's unnecessary. We can just put knot and horsecock in the tags of the image and if users want to find horsecock with a knot, they can just search knot horsecock -canine. I've checked it, and all of Peekaboo's examples and more examples were found in that search

But, sometimes people want something more specific, and I myself have had to edit some tags in that search because there were canine peni and regular horsecock in the picture.

Fluttershy said:
Not the same concept. Already explained in my previous post.

Thank you, Fluttershy.

Peekaboo said:
Eh, not a big deal if we don't have a knotted_horsecock tag. But since it doesn't break TWYS, and it makes it easier to find what you're looking for - I don't see the harm of having it.

This.

You know what, fuck what I said. Currently, I am really not in the best of shape for debates right now and I'm in the minority in this one so do whatever guys want. Just forget what I've said

Fluttershy said:
Not really, anyone with a little knowledge in anatomy knows a canine penis has a knot already so there's no need to repeat that IN canine penis, for a horsecock however...

Doesn't have to, you can have a canine shaped penis without a knot.

TheHuskyK9 said:
You know what, fuck what I said. Currently, I am really not in the best of shape for debates right now and I'm in the minority in this one so do whatever guys want. Just forget what I've said

Definitely don't say that, it was the same point I was making, just with more words.

Peekaboo said:
Please don't, I appreciate the points you made :3

That's all good but I'm actually not thinking straight right now. In honesty, I'm starting to freak out

post #303832 post #301438
My best two examples of a knotted horsecock, btw.

I'm against knotted_horsecock. Well, the TAG. The item itself... Anyway! Knot + horsecock works fine. Unnecessary tag.

anon_X said:
I'm against knotted_horsecock. Well, the TAG. The item itself... Anyway! Knot + horsecock works fine. Unnecessary tag.

Peekaboo said:
Eh, not a big deal if we don't have a knotted_horsecock tag. But since it doesn't break TWYS, and it makes it easier to find what you're looking for - I don't see the harm of having it.

Forgive me for going down the slippery slope theory, but what harm would blue_furred_canine do?

We don't usually combine adjectives and nouns to make new tags for the reasons mentioned.

ippiki_ookami said:
We don't usually combine adjectives and nouns to make new tags for the reasons mentioned.

My bad. I apologize for that.

mason-zain said:
My bad. I apologize for that.

Never a need to apologize. Ideas are what makes the 6 go round.

I don't know why, but I kind of want to agree with this tag. I'm usually against this type of tag. It's sort of an unusual combination, where the knot tag is dominated by canine penises. Searching knot horsecock -canine could potentially hide results because there just happens to be a dog in the same image of a knotted horsecock. Additionally, it seems like something people would want to search or blacklist.

How common is it? If there's just under dozen images, then maybe it'd just be better to use the unusual_penis tag. But if there's more than that and it's easy to distinguish from other types (which it seems to be), then I think it might deserves its own tag. Though I'm not a fan of the suggested name.

anon_X said:
Forgive me for going down the slippery slope theory, but what harm would blue_furred_canine do?

Not quite the same. From practical point of view, tags are only useful if they actually get tagged consistently. Most images are currently even missing the <color>_fur tags. Adding the countless <color>_<fur/skin/body>_<species> tags would be a tagging nightmare.

Seven_Twenty said:
I don't know why, but I kind of want to agree with this tag. I'm usually against this type of tag. It's sort of an unusual combination, where the knot tag is dominated by canine penises. Searching knot horsecock -canine could potentially hide results because there just happens to be a dog in the same image of a knotted horsecock. Additionally, it seems like something people would want to search or blacklist.

You do pose an interesting point.

Well if it upholds tag what you see, gives more specific search results, then I see no harm in adding it to what is already tagged as well

Rainbow_Dash said:
Well if it upholds tag what you see, gives more specific search results, then I see no harm in adding it to what is already tagged as well

Agreed.

Rainbow_Dash said:
Well if it upholds tag what you see, gives more specific search results, then I see no harm in adding it to what is already tagged as well

It's a case of too specific, though. Horsecock is already there, as is knot. knotted_horsecock is so specific it only returns a bare handful of images. if people want to see it, they can search knot horsecock and any other tags they want and just search through the handful of images they find.

123easy said:
It's a case of too specific, though. Horsecock is already there, as is knot. knotted_horsecock is so specific it only returns a bare handful of images. if people want to see it, they can search knot horsecock and any other tags they want and just search through the handful of images they find.

Perhaps you are right

We'll if this gets added, I think knotted_humanoid_penis or knotted_tapering_penis should be considered or at least debated as well.
post #443524 post #80273 post #265249 post #399422 post #435298

I've seen a lot of these just get the canine_penis tag instead of what type and knot

pc-king said:
We'll if this gets added, I think knotted_humanoid_penis or knotted_tapering_penis should be considered or at least debated as well.
post #443524 post #80273 post #265249 post #399422 post #435298

I've seen a lot of these just get the canine_penis tag instead of what type and knot

if it's not a canine penis but gets tagged as such because of having a knot, then that's bad tagging, and should be fixed.

123easy said:
if it's not a canine penis but gets tagged as such because of having a knot, then that's bad tagging, and should be fixed.

Agreed. That second one certainly isn't a canine penis, even though it has a knot.