Topic: Tag unimplication: krystal -> fox

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

JoeX said:
I think we should un-implicate krystal from fox because of images like these.
post #198926
post #198229
As you can see, she is not a fox in either of those images.

Do we tag pony for anthrofied ponies, or other races' base race when anthro'd or ponified? If so, then keep it as is. If no, then change it as said.

Updated by anonymous

123easy said:
Do we tag pony for anthrofied ponies, or other races' base race when anthro'd or ponified? If so, then keep it as is. If no, then change it as said.

We tag pony for anthrofied ponies because they are ponies of the anthrofied state, but let's say they were drawn as crab people; they would no longer receive the pony tag and thus I think this implication should be deleted and will proceed to do so if no one has any objections

Updated by anonymous

why was this even done in the first place

removed, might require some cleanup

Updated by anonymous

Rainbow_Dash said:
We tag pony for anthrofied ponies because they are ponies of the anthrofied state, but let's say they were drawn as crab people; they would no longer receive the pony tag and thus I think this implication should be deleted and will proceed to do so if no one has any objections

That makes no sense. If they're anthrofied then they're human, aka EqG. Why should ponies get that privledge but nothing else?

Updated by anonymous

123easy said:
That makes no sense. If they're anthrofied then they're human, aka EqG. Why should ponies get that privledge but nothing else?

I think you got anthrofied mixed up with humanized.

ippiki_ookami said:
why was this even done in the first place

removed, might require some cleanup

Brilliant. Could you maybe also unimplicate miles_prower from fox? Since there are quite a few humanized ones that shouldn't have the fox tag.

Updated by anonymous

123easy said:
That makes no sense. If they're anthrofied then they're human, aka EqG. Why should ponies get that privledge but nothing else?

I do think you have anthrofied mixed with humanized as that doesn't just apply to ponies, that applies to everything anthrofied. It gets the species tag of whatever species is being anthrofied

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:

Brilliant. Could you maybe also unimplicate miles_prower from fox? Since there are quite a few humanized ones that shouldn't have the fox tag.

yeah

Updated by anonymous

White_Len said:
How did you find those so fast?

I actually only took about 20 minutes of that hour I took since I left the computer a while after my first post. I mainly used tag group:species (which can really do with some updating) for finding species and what's implicated to them.

Updated by anonymous

Seven_Twenty said:
I actually only took about 20 minutes of that hour I took since I left the computer a while after my first post. I mainly used tag group:species (which can really do with some updating) for finding species and what's implicated to them.

Huh, didn't know that existed. Thanks for sharing.

Updated by anonymous

It would be even better if the implications were linked, otherwise I'll get around to deleting these in a bit

Updated by anonymous

Seven_Twenty said:

I'm not sure about that one.

I suppose it might possible that there's a non-foxy Renamon...
But that implication is pretty much the same as various Pokemon implications, such as fennekin -> fennec, etc. Should those also be removed?

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
I'm not sure about that one.

I'm not really sure about that one either, but I wanted to bring it up to see what other people would think.

Updated by anonymous

Rainbow_Dash said:
It would be even better if the implications were linked, otherwise I'll get around to deleting these in a bit

Links have all been added!

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
I'm not sure about that one.

I suppose it might possible that there's a non-foxy Renamon...
But that implication is pretty much the same as various Pokemon implications, such as fennekin -> fennec, etc. Should those also be removed?

It's both a character (Rika's Renamon) and a species, so... In this case I'd treat it as the species primarily, same with Pikachu and others.

Updated by anonymous

Also, that ashchu implication should be kept.
It specifically refers to the one episode where Ash got turned into a Pikachu, so I don't see how it could possibly be properly tagged if there's no Pikachus...

Updated by anonymous

Seven_Twenty said:
I'm not really sure about that one either, but I wanted to bring it up to see what other people would think.

post #208891
yep

Updated by anonymous

ippiki_ookami said:
post #208891
yep

That looks more like cosplay. It's a cat with some arm bands, nothing more that suggests it's the character Renamon in the image in any other way.

Updated by anonymous

123easy said:
That looks more like cosplay. It's a cat with some arm bands, nothing more that suggests it's the character Renamon in the image in any other way.

but it has renamon's markings

Updated by anonymous

  • 1