Why those tags are made strictly linked?

Female is related to having breasts or a vagina, either for pregnancy, rape or for sexual activity. Human is relating to certain life style or role-play, involving relation of rich and poor or total submission of wage-slave to boss, often associated with semiconsensual, consensual non-consent, or or actively forceful conversation or other activity, for example sadistic\masochistic mobbing. Female may be part of it, but may be NOT.

In addition dildo is a sex toy which can be used for Female or for Human, but is own of its kind.

Linking those tags together sometimes produces inaccurate or even wrong results.

woman =/= any female of any species. woman = female human. Thus, woman = human. And no, human does not mean what you're implying.

Hmm, I think, OP is german or some similar language, may be? Loss of translation, human <-> Mann ?

Human is any one of homo sapiens species, hence "humankind". It's just, any of us. In archaic meaning, in poetic context it can translated as "mortal".

Use female for non-human female. Woman usually refers to human one.
Might be some awkwardness, for e.g. elf female to refer elven woman, instead of elf woman, but it's systematic, at least.

okay wait what? How are they linked?

ROfl, haha, yeah, no one checked if they actually are. They actually aren't aliased or later not implicated by former. Alias would be wrong in this case, implication? mm, dunno, might be unnecessary bloat, just like 123easy suggested with other tag

Absolutely no implication or alias as there are female everything's

God dammit it's a parody of this weird thread:
https://e621.net/forum/show/110736

I thought it would be obvious but not a single user understood.

Der_Traubenfuchs said:
God dammit it's a parody of this weird thread:
https://e621.net/forum/show/110736

I thought it would be obvious but not a single user understood.

I just thought it was another patented-formula Der Traubenfuchs™ thread.

Rainbow_Dash said:
Absolutely no implication or alias as there are female everything's

Not trying to be a punk or derail or anything but weren't all the Namekians dudes? Correct me if i am wrong.

Suineder said:
I just thought it was another patented-formula Der Traubenfuchs™ thread.

This.

Der_Traubenfuchs said:
God dammit it's a parody of this weird thread:
https://e621.net/forum/show/110736

I thought it would be obvious but not a single user understood.

"I get it, I ain't laughing, but I get it"
-Meatwad (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)

TheHuskyK9 said:
"I get it, I ain't laughing, but I get it"
-Meatwad (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)

This distresses me.
I am now unhappy.

So, being gay and sexist go hand-in-hand?

K.

Suineder said:
I just thought it was another patented-formula Der Traubenfuchs™ thread.

I thought he had ingested Drano, and was just shitposting as a result of the gastronomic trauma.

Ryuzaki_Izawa said:
So, being gay and sexist go hand-in-hand?

K.

I didn't really see this, I don't have any clue why you'd bring it up either...

Der_Traubenfuchs said:
God dammit it's a parody of this weird thread:
https://e621.net/forum/show/110736

I thought it would be obvious but not a single user understood.

Not quite same thing , then. Women do not think that they aren't humans normally.. HUGE amount of people who are into bondage consider themselves not be into BDSM, because they do not condone lifestyle, do not submit to anyone, not into top\bottom interaction, or in some cases - are totally asexual or not doing any sexual interaction in combination with bondage (bondage might be just visual thing). Also any profession shibari master - nawa sensei would be your mortal enemy if you tell them that what they do is bdsm. It's like you would tell artist that what he is doing is called dyeing canvas.

Also, you accidently almost hit troubled topic, because right now e621 go woman aliased to female, lol, and actually someone tried to alias women to human.

Swiftkill said:
HUGE amount of people who are into bondage consider themselves not be into BDSM

There are also guys who will suck another dude's dick and say they're not gay.

Your point?

SirAntagonist said:
There are also guys who will suck another dude's dick and say they're not gay.

Your point?

They might be bisexual or pansexuals (almost same thing, but first ones still follow gender steretypes and gender roles)

My point is that's least than a huge amount.. I'm talking abut like millions of people, roughly, if speak of those who use occasionally bondage as part of foreplay or otherwise normal, bedroom sex. Thousands probably use it as visual art, dozens of thousands if you include shibari art as bondage sub-type, and do not use it for sexual intercourse, foreplay, or anything rather than creative hobby or performance.

Did we forget that this is a joke thread?

Swiftkill said:
They might be bisexual or pansexuals (almost same thing, but first ones still follow gender steretypes and gender roles)

My point is that's least than a huge amount.. I'm talking abut like millions of people, roughly, if speak of those who use occasionally bondage as part of foreplay or otherwise normal, bedroom sex. Thousands probably use it as visual art, dozens of thousands if you include shibari art as bondage sub-type, and do not use it for sexual intercourse, foreplay, or anything rather than creative hobby or performance.

participating in bondage is participating in BDSM in at least a small part. Just because you participate in the some aspects on the fringe of it doesn't mean that you are into all that it entails. It's a broad umbrella for all sorts of things, sheesh.

TheHuskyK9 said:
Did we forget that this is a joke thread?

Yes, I know.. :( but you should actually understand their and my problem, because its same problem as your with big\huge\hyper sizes of genitalia (The Big Balls thread).

Personally even I usually want to filter out hard bdsm for bondage play stuff, because I do not want to look at "hard bdsm" cartoon bloat (which is also very unrealistical or absolutely not entertaining to me - speak of knowledge being spoiling the fun). Especially with MLP, I had to blacklist anything with friendship is magic and mlp to avoid see that.

Swiftkill said:
Yes, I know.. :( but you should actually understand their and my problem, because its same problem as your with big\huge\hyper sizes of genitalia (The Big Balls thread).

Personally even I usually want to filter out hard bdsm for bondage play stuff, because I do not want to look at "hard bdsm" cartoon bloat (which is also very unrealistical or absolutely not entertaining to me - speak of knowledge being spoiling the fun). Especially with MLP, I had to blacklist anything with friendship is magic and mlp to avoid see that.

We have BDSM for the entire umbrella tag for that kind of thing. If you don't want to see the harder BDSM, then blacklist the individual parts of it you don't want to see, such as blood, gore, etc. This is probably the best way to approach this without having to make different tags to accompany different levels of BDSM

Swiftkill said:
They might be bisexual or pansexuals (almost same thing, but first ones still follow gender steretypes and gender roles)

My point is that's least than a huge amount.. I'm talking abut like millions of people, roughly, if speak of those who use occasionally bondage as part of foreplay or otherwise normal, bedroom sex. Thousands probably use it as visual art, dozens of thousands if you include shibari art as bondage sub-type, and do not use it for sexual intercourse, foreplay, or anything rather than creative hobby or performance.

That's cool. It's still BDSM.

The same way eating an orange is eating an orange. It doesn't matter if you're doing it for health, pleasure, or boredom.

You're still eating a goddamn orange.

SirAntagonist said:
That's cool. It's still BDSM.

The same way eating an orange is eating an orange. It doesn't matter if you're doing it for health, pleasure, or boredom.

You're still eating a goddamn orange.

Well said. You could even refer to the entire orange as BDSM, bondage as the orange slices (how deep do you want to go? Only a light play? One slice. Full body restriction? have half. Suspension? add another slice... You get the idea), the zest as D/s play, the pith as S/M play (make someone eat orange pith and you'll feel a bit of sadistic glee at their reaction. Similarily, if you enjoy the overly bitter taste for the way it makes you cringe at the flavour (as someone that loves Buckley's cough syrup...)), that's (sado)masochistic. :P

Rainbow, this forum was a joke created by OP as parody on mine and it's a quite new one? Wouldn't it better actually create thread linked to implication itself (as I suppose, implication was creted by admin)

Swiftkill said:
Rainbow, this forum was a joke created by OP as parody on mine and it's a quite new one? Wouldn't it better actually create thread linked to implication itself (as I suppose, implication was creted by admin)

Alright conversation moved to forum #111924

My apologies for locking it, but I just didn't want three going at once