Aliasing fit → athletic
Link to alias

Reason:

More or less mean the same thing, except to those
who use 'fit' as slang to describe 'pretty'.
(I will never understand those people)

Could also be aliased to toned, should the tag stay as it is (see forum #170108).

Either alias works.

Plus one.

It might get mistagged if someone forgets the underscore from tight_fit, but that's probably not a common occurrence.

I'll plan on going through the muscle-related tags today. They've long been neglected and it would be nice to get them all sorted out finally.

It would be nice to have a specific tag for "In good shape, but not covered in muscles".

We have like 10 tags for varying levels of fatness, why not fitness?

Random said:
It would be nice to have a specific tag for "In good shape, but not covered in muscles".

We have like 10 tags for varying levels of fatness, why not fitness?

Toned.

Well, though that one still requires some manner of musculature, but within very sane proportions. Seems pretty close to your description.

I made the following changes:

• Alias: fit -> athletic (approved)
• Alias: toned -> athletic (approved) - From forum #170108

Also from forum #170108 is some pending ones, some of which had implications to muscles in the past.

• biceps, triceps, pecs, abs -> muscle_group? Otherwise we could just make a tag group:muscles and put them in there for reference.
• flexing - Kind of an odd tag
• muscle_growth - An implication to muscular might be justified, but I'm not sure. Honestly muscle_transformation seems a bit more accurate for how this is used...

parasprite said:

Also from forum #170108 is some pending ones, some of which had implications to muscles in the past.

• biceps, triceps, pecs, abs -> muscle_group? Otherwise we could just make a tag group:muscles and put them in there for reference.

As the muscles tag already has an alias to muscular, I would think all individual muscle groups could (should?) be aliased to it as well; the tagging of every individual muscle group is starting to get a bit silly.

I had previously asked that abs be exempted from this alias, yet this is based more on personal preference, than on functionality. abs be sexier than all the other muscle groups combined, methinks, and the only muscle-type I have ever used in a search.

As a side note, flexing seems to have a home along side pose, as in a 'muscular posing by a bodybuilder'. I vote that it stays, no matter how much I dislike works featuring the tags huge_muscles and/or hyper_muscles.

Flexing is one of the few muscles-related tags that actually get tagged consistently. So I'm for keeping it.

Maybe we could add implications for flexing:

flexing -> pose

flexing -> muscular