Updated by furrypickle
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Updated by furrypickle
I second that.
Updated by anonymous
Peekaboo said:
I disagree, aliasing cumming to orgasm would lead to a lot of faulty tagging since some may just use for ejaculations.
Well... The other alternative would be to alias it to cum.
But cumshot is currently implicated to orgasm, so therefore cumming is already implicated to it too. So this suggested alias wouldn't change that.
Do you suppose that cumshot -> orgasm should be unimplicated? It might be a bit inaccurate for offscreen cumshots, such as post #58992...
Updated by anonymous
Someone's squirting that bunny with plain yoghurt.
Updated by anonymous
I have no idea if we want to get into the debate of whether or not we can always tag a male orgasm with cum even if no actual cum is coming out but just that goo stuff that comes before the cum (apologies for my lack of knowledge on this)
Even then though a female orgasm will not result in cum as we have defined it and therefor that might not be the best thing to alias it to
Updated by anonymous
whoops, read that as imply cumming to orgasm. Do not support that alias. cum = male orgasm, though, always. Ejaculation is the result of orgasm.
Updated by anonymous
Bump.
This remains unfixed. I'm not sure how large portion of cumshot mistags are caused by this alias, but it's probably significant enough that this needs to handled.
Updated by anonymous
Rainbow_Dash said:
I have no idea if we want to get into the debate of whether or not we can always tag a male orgasm with cum even if no actual cum is coming out but just that goo stuff that comes before the cum (apologies for my lack of knowledge on this)
That's pre-cum (pre), and it gets hard to distinguish pre from regular cum in a majority of posts.
Updated by anonymous
+1 cumming -> orgasm
Updated by anonymous
+1 cumming -> orgasm
Updated by anonymous
My initial verdict wasn't all that.
cumming -> orgasm
Sure, I can agree on this.
+1
Updated by anonymous