Topic: Tag Implication: hindpaw → paws

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

This isn't a discussion, it's a notification that the implication has already been set up.

If someone disagrees with it, THEN you can give it your support.

Updated by anonymous

Don't see why support would have to wait for opposition. The entire point is that a mod would review the thread before approving anyways, so positive opinions from others than the proposer can't really hurt.

Also, the alias system is broken at the moment so it can't have anything added. So really, a suggestion and/or discussion is all that it is right now.

Updated by anonymous

Why can't the alias/implication system go back to how it was? I liked it better then.

Updated by anonymous

The point of the forum thread being created is FOR discussion, either for or against the implication/alias.

Riversyde said:
Why can't the alias/implication system go back to how it was? I liked it better then.

It's the same as it was before (well, once it gets fixed and aliases/implications are ACTUALLY added...) but now there's a corresponding thread for discussion about it.

Updated by anonymous

Okay, maybe I worded that wrong. It just seemed to me that with the "+1 vote", Blaziken believed this was someone asking for the implication to be made.

Updated by anonymous

Well, essentially they are. Somebody below mod level can't add aliases. They can only add an alias request, it still has to be actually added by a mod.

Again, that's assuming the system is working right, which it's currently not -- attempting to add a request or an alias is currently impossible, all trying does is create the forum topic to discuss it.

[EDIT]
Whenever I said alias, I meant implication. Same system, so it all still applies, I just wasn't paying enough attention.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1