Bondage seems to be aliased with BDSM, but although bondage 'is' a part of BDSM, hence the acronym, there's some cases where the case of bondage is so light and minor, the pic would hardly classify as BDSM, or at least in my opinion, such as post #77657

What gives?

"Bondage implies BDSM", not "... aliased with..." -- two different tagging features.

The over-generalization comes from the fact that BDSM is an umbrella group (it's not a tag of its own, it's a tag added automatically by any one of many sub-tags), so it's inherently going to have the lowest-grade stuff from any one sub-tag, as well as the higher-grade / more-relevant / 'harder' stuff. It's an inherent attribute/flaw of the system, so I don't think anything can really be done as it is.

(Edit: Mis-wrote first sentence, didn't notice at first.)

It almost saddens me that you disscus such a subject.