Implicating horror, what has science done, etc. -> nightmare_fuel.

Reason: obvious, no?

Those aren't usually nightmare fuel.

Shatari said:
Those aren't usually nightmare fuel.

this~

Oh gosh no. nightmare_fuel should be something far odder and more unsettling than run-of-the-mill bloody horror and generic zombie monsters. At it's best the tag's got some deep outsider art craziness in it, and I for one am very glad.

Horror: :(
What has science done: 8|
nightmare fuel: D:

or for the non-emoticon literate:

horror: eew..
what has science done: omg.
nightmare fuel: OH GOD WHY DID I CLICK THAT WHO WOULD MAKE THIS?!

What has science done isn't going to always be nightmare fuel. But, horror and nightmare_fuel should mesh well together. Of course, horror could be more of a genre and may not be all that scary as what the nightmare fuel tag is supposed to convey.

horror/nightmare fuel was last brought up over here: forum #17522 still distinct... a week hasn't changed much~~

SnowWolf said:
horror/nightmare fuel was last brought up over here: forum #17522 still distinct... a week hasn't changed much~~

Ah, my bad. I have never even read that post.

I'm sorry, I totally forgot that thread. D: Bad me! That's what happens when you're cycling through tens of posts per day and constantly adding new threads, especially when tired (I really need to sleep more x_x). You forget the old ones. x_x Even if the implication is in reverse, it's still bad me. sorry.

It happens. Worse yet, I lost my to do list' when my computer melted down earlier. I've got to go through the last 5 pages or so and find the other dozen or so projects I have on my list.