Reason: Same thing.

Eh. Breasts are breasts. I say we alias both of them to breasts.

Nah, natural_breasts is a shape/look tag. It defines not just that they're breasts, but that they droop and sag realistically, ie; natural breasts, not ones that magically float in the air without sag or bra.

If you're looking for realistic breasts, what the hell are you doing on here?

Rofl. Just because you like furs doesn't mean you have to like silicone-tits. :P Either way, it's a valid tag, imo, because it's not something that's subjective, and provides a catagory not easily available by combining two tags.

I'm with 123 on this one. natural_breasts needs to stay, jsut as much as huge and big and hyper do. :)

huge and big and hyper don't need to all stay because there's quite a few too many size variable tags. natural_breasts is the only shape-based one that I'm aware of (that doesn't involve stuff like flattening them) and it separates balloon-type tits/tits that are drawn to look eternally perky/up when they shouldn't be from realistically designed/drawn tits. Variety is the spice of life, certainly, but there's also such thing as overspecialization, and I think the size tags are just that.

Breast tags proposal

Size: flat - small - big - hyper

"Big" being believably large breasts, while consolidating "huge" into "hyper" to mean unrealistically large breasts. If there any disagreements on individual cases, then we should hold a vote in the comments section of the post.

Shape: droopy - natural - perky - balloon (someone help me think of a better word)

"Droopy" being extremely sagging breasts (think old ladies), and "balloon" meaning unrealistically perky breasts. Discrepancies would be handled as above. This one's tricky, though. Breast shape can be altered by the clothes the character is wearing (namely bras). Therefore, if a character's breasts aren't exposed then the "balloon" term may not be applicable since they may have some sort of support garment.

Just my thoughts on the subject.

Already discussing that sorta thing over in forum #17012 Kloz, regarding size. As for shape though-

Droopy - Natural - Silicone? :P Honestly, if it's normally perky breasts, I don't think it should need a tag specifically for it- If just because the large majority of pictures are of perky breasts, and the various shape tags would be more to differentiate from the norm than to affirm. It's why I made the suggestion of sizes being changed to <size>(breast_size) tags and have them all imply breasts.

droopy_breasts -> Natural_breasts added

Not all natural breasts are droopy since a lot of people have naturally perky boobs. I started a tag for sagging breasts on Danbooru and it works, so maybe it'd work here for droopy breasts as well.

Even the most perky natural breasts sag naturally unless they're AA-B cup. breasts don't naturally defy gravity.

the thing with the "naturally perky" breasts is they either:

1) sag naturally slightly, at which point they are 'droopy'
2) do not sag at all, at which point, .. well, how do you tell them from a similarly sized inflataboob?

the work isn't so much as important as the idea is. And "natural" is a much more 'pleasing" work then droopy. Or sagging.

SnowWolf said:
the thing with the "naturally perky" breasts is they either:

1) sag naturally slightly, at which point they are 'droopy'
2) do not sag at all, at which point, .. well, how do you tell them from a similarly sized inflataboob?

the work isn't so much as important as the idea is. And "natural" is a much more 'pleasing" work then droopy. Or sagging.

You have a point, but in my mind, if I see "saggy" or "droopy" breasts, I'm picturing old woman tits. Ok ok, so not necessarily old, wrinkly boobies, but you get the idea. Tits that are drooping or sagging waaay more than they used to when she/he was 20. Breasts that are making their way south for the long winter of menopause. I will say that after a short search, the only images tagged with "droopy_breasts" are ones that are sagging a little just because they're really big, so taggers seem to have your viewpoint on what it means.

I mean, i've seen young adults with large boobs that seem like they could be fake, and those with smaller breasts that seemed more like runny eggs, Both natural. But I guess if everyone only cares about the idea and not the actual wording, we can keep "natural breasts".

Ultima_Weapon said:
I mean, i've seen young adults with large boobs that seem like they could be fake, and those with smaller breasts that seemed more like runny eggs, Both natural. But I guess if everyone only cares about the idea and not the actual wording, we can keep "natural breasts".

Emphasis mine. That's exactly what differentiates them from natural-looking breasts, which is what natural_breasts is used for. If we wanted to be exceedingly accurate, we could name it natural_looking_breasts.