predator_prey
predator_prey_relationship
predator_fucks_prey
prey_fucks_predator
predator_prey_reversal
Just alias all these to predator_prey_relationship perhaps?
Updated by Riversyde
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
predator_prey
predator_prey_relationship
predator_fucks_prey
prey_fucks_predator
predator_prey_reversal
Just alias all these to predator_prey_relationship perhaps?
Updated by Riversyde
I don't see the need for any of these tags.
Updated by anonymous
Seeing as they all represent the same thing, it's not obvious which one should be used, and they all have a sizable amount of posts, this looks like the perfect use of an alias. How about aliasing them all to predator_prey?
Updated by anonymous
Eh, predator_prey is rather ambiguous and may be confusing without the _relationship part.
Also, another tag to alias (don't see the need to start another topic...): shadow_squirrel -> karol_pawlinski . Same artist, uses karol pawlinski most of the time to sign his work.
Updated by anonymous
kaik, make a new thread for other implications suggestions.
That said, I agree with the predator_prey_relationship point, and a reasonable usage- Cat and mouse, for example. These pairings are often played with because of their natural tendancies to eat/be eaten, and often ends up with a smart-ass remark like "Oooh, I never knew a cat could eat me this way!" or some such silliness.
Updated by anonymous
Aliasing these all to predator_prey_relationship, then.
Updated by anonymous
A thought just occurred to me, to think that this tag should be predator/prey_relationship, not what it is now. Having a slash in there indicates something happening between them.
Updated by anonymous
Good point. Alias to predator/prey_relationship would be fine to me. It should also imply predator and prey obviously.
Updated by anonymous
123easy said:
Good point. Alias to predator/prey_relationship would be fine to me. It should also imply predator and prey obviously.
I don't see why it needs to.
Updated by anonymous
Riversyde said:
I don't see why it needs to.
So that e6 becomes self aware.
Updated by anonymous
trfg7xz2oxps said:
So that e6 becomes self aware.
fuck that shit
Updated by anonymous
If there's a predator/prey relationship going on, obviously there's a predator and a prey subject in the image, no? Can't have a predator/prey relationship without a predator or prey.
Updated by anonymous
123easy said:
If there's a predator/prey relationship going on, obviously there's a predator and a prey subject in the image, no? Can't have a predator/prey relationship without a predator or prey.
Yeah, but, why bother?
Updated by anonymous
accuracy? Plus, the predator and prey tags already exist. They deserve to be filled out more where appropriate.
Updated by anonymous
Just cause they're already there doesn't mean we have to keep them. They could be replaced by interspecies or vore.
Updated by anonymous