Same thing really, but cum_taste has twice as many posts.

You've got girls eating their vagina by-products in i_has_a_flavor too.

licking_fluids?

Cum_taste and I_has_a_flavor should be relegated to invalid tags, or replaced with Licking or something.

how about self_tasting for gender neutrality

But they cover specific actions not coverable by any other tag.

tony311 said:
But they cover specific actions not coverable by any other tag.

cum_in_mouth?

cum_taste and i_has_a_flavor specifically look for "active" tasting as opposed to pictures without those tags - pictures that don't explicitly and specifically exhibit "tasting" cum - but it happens nonetheless with cum_in_mouth.

Whether you're looking at cum_in_mouth as referring to the "act" of cumming in the mouth or rather cum "being" in the mouth, either intention should cover cum_taste or i_has_a_flavor for their very niche purposes.

But cum_taste is specifically for people using their fingers to taste (usually their own) cum, which is distinctly separate from the act of ejaculating INTO someone's mouth, see:

post #50947 post #57963 post #91993 post #74574

tony311 said:
But cum_taste is specifically for people using their fingers to taste (usually their own) cum, which is distinctly separate from the act of ejaculating INTO someone's mouth, see:

post #50947 post #57963 post #91993 post #74574

I addressed that.

"Whether you're looking at cum_in_mouth as referring to the "ACT" OF CUMMING IN THE MOUTH or rather CUM "BEING" IN THE MOUTH," either intention should cover cum_taste or i_has_a_flavor for their VERY NICHE PURPOSES."

I reiterate - "very niche purposes." However, I'm sure we have other tags with far smaller populations, so my argument for invalidating these tags rests heavily on the assumption that there are very few or "too" few examples of cum_taste and i_has_a_flavor to validate their being kept around.

That being said, this is an opinion I doubt many people share, and I don't necessarily see a reason to remove the tags. It's not like the bandwidth for this site charges by the tag.

105 posts between cum_taste and i_has_a_flavor, and that's just the ones that are tagged. So no, I don't consider it an insignificant tag and believe it's distinct and common enough to warrant its own tag.

slyroon said:
how about self_tasting for gender neutrality

I can completely agree with this, plus it gets the point across clearly and consisely.

123easy said:
I can completely agree with this, plus it gets the point across clearly and consisely.

My only (minor) issue with that is it's not immediately clear that it's referring to cum, as opposed to, like, licking yourself.

HELLOOO...

Riversyde said:
You've got girls eating their vagina by-products in i_has_a_flavor too.

IS I INVIZIBLEH OAR SUMFIN

Riversyde said:
HELLOOO... IS I INVIZIBLEH OAR SUMFIN

Who said that?

Riversyde said:
You've got girls eating their vagina by-products in i_has_a_flavor too.

Your post and Sly's are why I immediately thought self_tasting is appropriate. It's not just cum, but pussy juices as well, male and female respectively. It just fits.

Editted to put the right quote in. I was tired as fuck when I wrote this initially.

123easy said:
Your post and Sly's are why I immediately thought self_tasting is appropriate. It's not just cum, but pussy juices as well, male and female respectively. It just fits.

That post was more directed towards tony and kavali.

Alias it to cum-taste.

RedOctober said:
Alias it to cum-taste.

A woman's juices aren't cum. If anything, they're close to precum as a natural lubricant. Either way, 'cum' shouldn't be part of the tag, as it concerns the licking of all sexual fluids, not just cum.

bump for resolution.

Alternatively, have two seperate tags. cum-taste for male, juice-taste for female.

Also, regardless, i_has_a_flavor is plainly a very stupid-sounding tag due to meme-age.

I now agree with self-tasting.

I see someone read my post and resurrected this haha! Thank you.