Is it still solo if an image has multiple depictions of the same character? i.e. a character sheet or something like post #5411 or post #6567

I'd say yes because it's still only one character.

yeppers

I'd agree. I hadn't been adding it as I go through, because I wasn't sure and just hadn't gotten around to bringing it up yet.

And images that have within them images of others? Like
post #17751

I'm assuming it's still solo, but I want to be sure.

RedOctober said:
And images that have within them images of others? Like
post #17751

I'm assuming it's still solo, but I want to be sure.

Yes that's still solo.

Thanks for the clarifications.

Strangely enough neither of the first two example pictures had the solo tag before I just changed them. Clearly they weren't the primary catalysts for this question. Regardless, the clarification is good to know.

closet_furry said:
Strangely enough neither of the first two example pictures had the solo tag before I just changed them. Clearly they weren't the primary catalysts for this question. Regardless, the clarification is good to know.

That's odd. They should have. I was pretty sure I tagged those. Oh well. Thanks.

I'd argue that a picture is "solo" in this case only if it has no background and the characters are obviously not interacting. So OP's first picture is good, but, say, 50 <character> in a swimming pool is not solo. Also, in the case of his second picture, it is essentially two "solo" pictures merged into one. So, regardless of the backgrounds, it is also solo.