Topic: tag alias/implication: facial_hair <-> beard

Posted under General

It seems like something needs to be done there.
The minimal request from me is: implication: beard -> facial_hair
And maybe you even want to combine/alias them?

Updated by Rainbow Dash

Akkira said:
It seems like something needs to be done there.
The minimal request from me is: implication: beard -> facial_hair
And maybe you even want to combine/alias them?

I wouldn't combine or alias them IMO, sideburns and mustaches are also considered facial hair and they've got nothing to do with beards.

Updated by anonymous

randomwolfguy said:
I wouldn't combine or alias them IMO, sideburns and mustaches are also considered facial hair and they've got nothing to do with beards.

this

Updated by anonymous

Well presumably imply mustache (or moustache, I think both spellings are acceptable) and sideburns to facial_hair too...

Updated by anonymous

Goatee too while we're at it.

But on a separate note, should whiskers imply facial hair? It is technically such, but certainly not what one would usually think of when searching for facial hair, I'd think.

Updated by anonymous

Okay, I'll do moustache -> mustache alias
mustache -> facial_hair implication
sideburns -> facial_hair implication and
goatee -> facial_hair implication

Whiskers I'm not going to do anything with just because I don't think it's what people are meaning when they tag it or when they search it

Updated by anonymous

  • 1