Aliasing group -> group_sex.

Reason: The only reason I can think of for not having the tag implicated is if the group is not engaging in sexual activity, but is that necessary?

Uhm, yes? Contrary to popular belief, furries can gather in a crowd without it (immediately) devolving into a writhing mass of yiff. Why don't we try implicating group_sex +> group instead?

There are three tags about quantity, and quantity only. Group is one of them. I'm against aliasing.

So if you're in a group, you're automatically having sex? I should probably warn my coworkers then...

Ok, Ok. I just wasn't sure about the necessity of the tag group, but apparently it has it's uses.