yeah

no body? :(

Well,cum_everywhere is currently implicated to messy (cum_everywhere -> messy),in which the former needs serious..cleaning up.

Maybe an implication of cum_covered -> cum_everywhere as well?

Which results in the line:

cum_covered -> cum_everywhere -> messy

Of course,the person covered in cum might not necessarily be the 'majority' of the picture,which would probably not count as cum_everwhere

Well I don't know if cum_covered should be aliased to cum_everywhere, mainly for what you said - the latter.

btw, the wiki entry was written by me, and it isn't a very good denotation of cum_everywhere, but I feel that it needed to be created.

Why not just use 'bukkake' if you want messy cum everywhere?

KiwiPotato said:
Well I don't know if cum_covered should be aliased to cum_everywhere, mainly for what you said - the latter.

You're right!(that was an implication by the way)

titaniachkt said:
You're right!(that was an implication by the way)

Oops, yeah, I meant implication. :P

Mario583 said:
Why not just use 'bukkake' if you want messy cum everywhere?

Because this is not a searching dilemma. It's an implication dilemma.

Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "messy cum everywhere" as that does not really make sense. And this alias has nothing to do with cum_everywhere

Bukkake doesn't necessarily mean cum_everywhere anyway.
post #198212
^this is not a bukakke, but it is still excessive_cum/cum_covered/cum_everywhere.

BTW, I think excessive_cum should imply -> messy

well?

yet another bump

post #46063

this is bukkake, messy, AND cum everywhere.

alright, your point is?

Can someone give me a refresher on what exactly is being asked to be done here? A bit confused.

Riversyde said:
Can someone give me a refresher on what exactly is being asked to be done here? A bit confused.

Thread title, imply cum_covered -> messy. ;)

Ok, done.

Riversyde said:
Ok, done.

thanks