ok, if a tag is unique (as in if there is only one post for that tag) does it give someone the right to delete that tag?

i honestly don't think its neccesary.

someone deleted one of my tags in post #143307 just because they thought it was stupid

I mean come on, doesnt this post #143307 look like someone is planning world domination?

But are they? Or is it a subjective opinion that you add based on the Gendo crossed-fingers meme image that this is parodying? Tag what you see, not what you know or think.

123easy said:
But are they? Or is it a subjective opinion that you add based on the Gendo crossed-fingers meme image that this is parodying? Tag what you see, not what you know.

seriously 123easy, why are you doing that to my post? its starting to annoy me

isolated tags are okay to stay, if they are relevant to the what's in the image. I see no world domination occuring in that pic, so :P

Riversyde said:
I see no world domination occuring in that pic, so :P

no, but i do see someone planning it

Exactly. If there was a picture of the world in front of her and it had a MLP flag or something of the sort stuck in it, then yeah, sure, world domination. Otherwise, it's just a pose.

0904255 said:
no, but i do see someone planning it

i see celestia wearing glasses and posing?

And looking pretty sinister. Thus, added the sinister and pose tags.

123easy said:
And looking pretty sinister. Thus, added the sinister and pose tags.

Sinister? pffft! That pose obviously conveys pensiveness! The nerve of some people, ugh! Changing tags!

SOLUTION! Add BOTH!

I dunno. No, she isn't clearly planning world domination, but it could look kinda like that. I vote the tag stays just because I like a little humor here and there, though I certainly understand fully the arguments against it. I know I'm guilty of tossing on a flippant tag on a few posts, usually if I've just added "black_and_white" to a bunch of images that don't have it and I'm tired of looking at black and white and so put something amusing in. The few times, though, it's been quite relevant, so...I dunno. I think a better solution than Snow's is have as much brandy as I just did, then no one will care and will just look at porn :-D

well, I meant add pensive AND sinister ;)

but I don't mind a few goofy tags myself, especially if you go out of your way to take it on to a few OTHER images past the first one.

RedOctober said:
I dunno. No, she isn't clearly planning world domination, but it could look kinda like that. I vote the tag stays just because I like a little humor here and there, though I certainly understand fully the arguments against it. I know I'm guilty of tossing on a flippant tag on a few posts, usually if I've just added "black_and_white" to a bunch of images that don't have it and I'm tired of looking at black and white and so put something amusing in. The few times, though, it's been quite relevant, so...I dunno. I think a better solution than Snow's is have as much brandy as I just did, then no one will care and will just look at porn :-D

so YOU'RE the bastard making it so I've been having to clean all those monochrome tags off posts. :< RAEG!

Goofy/humour tags (what has science done, where's your god now, etc) so long as they're relevant to the picture, are fine. It's when they're not relevant and just added "for the lulz" and it tags a picture incorrectly, that it's D:< because that's just vandalism of the tag kind.

Eh? I never tag anything "monochrome," I only tag black and white images with "black_and_white." I have mixed feelings about it implying monochrome, but every time I think about it I argue with myself and eventually decide it's an ok implication.

black_and_white automatically implies monochrome. So whenever you add black_and_white you're automatically adding monochrome. And then I have to go and remove BOTH tags. :<

123easy said:
black_and_white automatically implies monochrome. So whenever you add black_and_white you're automatically adding monochrome. And then I have to go and remove BOTH tags. :<

Wait wait wait. Why are you removing the tag? Unless you're removing it from images that are NOT black and white, in which case I didn't put it there. Was there some discussion of the use of these tags that I missed?

RedOctober said:
Wait wait wait. Why are you removing the tag? Unless you're removing it from images that are NOT black and white, in which case I didn't put it there. Was there some discussion of the use of these tags that I missed?

I think there's been a miscommunication based around this sentence:

"usually if I've just added "black_and_white" to a bunch of images that don't have it"

Red sees: Adding black and white to black_and_white images that lack the black_and_white tag.
123easy seas: adding black and white to iamges that are not black and white.