Implicating threesome -> trio.

Reason: Since a threesome contains only 3 character.

Falord said:
Implicating threesome -> trio.

Reason: Since a threesome contains only 3 character.

Threesome is three having sex, whereas trio is three in the image. You could have a threesome with more than three in the image.

That's how it seems to me, anyway.

Also, do we need trio tag? I thought that it was agreed, that we don't have more needs than primitive cultures, and one, two, many is enough for us.

^^ What Anomaly said. Solo, duo, and group are sufficient. The line has to be drawn somewhere, or we get into trio, quartet, septet, sextet et cetera.

RedOctober said:
^^ What Anomaly said. Solo, duo, and group are sufficient. The line has to be drawn somewhere, or we get into trio, quartet, septet, sextet et cetera.

Yes got to draw the line somewhere.

Seriously? Not only tag was not deleted, but this implication was added?
Now this:
post #270985
is tagged as trio, which is wrong.

Can we at least remove that implication? (Or just delete this tag at all.)

Threesome applies to sexual involvement.
Trio applies to [see Three Musketeers]

Implication denied I say.

Hmm...

Threesome results in a gang bang.

Gang bang is a group of 3 three people or more.

Trio is a group of three people.

Anyone has to say about this?

Keats said:
Hmm...
Threesome results in a gang bang.
Gang bang is a group of 3 three people or more.
Trio is a group of three people.
Anyone has to say about this?

http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=2278848

aztlaniano stated
When referring to sex, "trío" is used in Spanish, but not in English, in my experience. In English it would be "a three-way" or "a ménage à trois", as well as "a threesome".
"Ménage à trois", in English, is virtually always in reference to sex.

Mario583 said:
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=2278848

Interesting.
So all this worriment is 'bout grammar? By such, threesome only involves BY sexual contact. However, a trio is only a word for describing a group of three people and nothing else.
The only difference between those words, is sexual contact.

...

" I would find "trio" much more natural than "threesome". -GreenWhiteBlue.

This is what I can understand, giving an example of a sentence by the forum:

"If you are going to have lunch with John could we make it a threesome?" -scotu

Your first ever thought will be in a different direction than what the sentence makes. Words have different meanings, and the same word can have a different meanings in a noun, adjective, pronoun etc.

So by the sentence, it has three (or probably more) ways to give you a thought or an understanding:
1. A sexual activity involving with three people.
2. A group of three people doing something else.
3. A musical band of three people.

Threesome - "A group of three persons or things : trio" - Merriam-Webster

I would like to see you counter-argument this definition that was officially given out in the 14th century.

So really, what there is else to define threesome without altering the number of people and sexual activity without using the word trio?

I am not against this, I am just rather questioning.

anomaly said:
Seriously? Not only tag was not deleted, but this implication was added?
Now this:
post #270985
is tagged as trio, which is wrong.

Can we at least remove that implication? (Or just delete this tag at all.)

Well you can change the tag to fix that problem since there are 4 character's in this picture. Changing to a group tag would solve that problem.

But any implied tag well have it's problems.
Like this post #277822
There's a threesome going on in the corner, but there's a duo happening as well. This pictures would fall under orgy or group_sex tag I believe because orgy wiki says more than 5 or more and group_sex says 3 or more which can includes a threesome by wiki explanation in some cases, which can be changed.

If the trio tag is to stay or go is up to the importance of the tag, which isn't that grand to fight over. If to go then the group tag should be implied to group_sex and the threesome tags. If to stay then work tags around it and make sure there are only 3 character in the picture even if there's a threesome going on with some other character/s are watching.

@Falord

NO!
group tag is quantity, and quantity only. It is used on safe pictures also. It should NOT be implied to anything sexual.

Generally definitions should be like this

solo - picture that have one only characters.
duo - picture that have only two character.
trio - probably picture that have only three characters. I'm against it existence, and 99% of its usage are from threesome implication.
group - picture that have more than 3 characters, if trio is valid, or more than two otherwise.

They should not be implicated to any sexual tag. They are independent from them.

Sexual tags like threesome, orgy etc. are, on the other hand, not related to total number of characters on pic, but to sexual activity going on pic. The only implications that can be valid are to group tag, because it has open range of number of characters in pic.

For example - threesome -> trio is invalid, cause 2 threesomes have more than 3 characters.
Foursome -> group is valid, cause every number of foursomes have more than 3 characters.

anomaly said:

NO!
group tag is quantity, and quantity only. It is used on safe pictures also. It should NOT be implied to anything sexual.

Generally definitions should be like this

solo - picture that have one only characters.
duo - picture that have only two character.
trio - probably picture that have only three characters. I'm against it existence, and 99% of its usage are from threesome implication.
group - picture that have more than 3 characters, if trio is valid, or more than two otherwise.

They should not be implicated to any sexual tag. They are independent from them.

Sexual tags like threesome, orgy etc. are, on the other hand, not related to total number of characters on pic, but to sexual activity going on pic. The only implications that can be valid are to group tag, because it has open range of number of characters in pic.

For example - threesome -> trio is invalid, cause 2 threesomes have more than 3 characters.
Foursome -> group is valid, cause every number of foursomes have more than 3 characters.

post #184119
The group tag was never stated to be a safe only tag just like duo or solo aren't either. Their just used to state quantity, nothing more. Their are tag that are for sexual quantity as you stated, but it is still stating that there is a quantity of participates in the image threesome means 3 anything at or above that number is group. And that "2 threesomes" thing I answered with post #277822, since there are more that 3 characters, just change the tags to suit aka group_sex or orgy.

But no matter how you roll the dice... an orgy is still a group of people performing a sexual act and there no rule in the English language were I can't say "That group of people over there was having an orgy" and be wrong. I say again group tag stats anything more than 3 so it can be implemented to any tag that requires 3 or more character to be used unless group is change to apply to 4 or more, then threesome can only imply trio in most cases as you said, if the tag remains that is.

I rest my case.

Sorry, I've misunderstood this sentence.

Fallord said:

the group tag should be implied to group_sex and the threesome tags.

and thought that you wanted to make implication from group to something of those two. I agree that
group_sex => group is valid, but if there would be trio tag
then threesome => group is invalid, unless group pics would contain trio pics for which I'm against.

since there are more that 3 characters, just change the tags to suit aka group_sex or orgy.

I can't delete trio tag becuase threesome implies it.
I can delete threesome tag from post #270985, but look at the picture. I see threesome, and 1 character watching it. Not foursome. Tag what you see - it should be tagged threesome, but it shouldn't be tagged trio

Maybe it should also have other tags group_sex, or orgy. Maybe those tags definitions are badly written. For now, I don't care, and I haven't said anything about that in my posts here. I care that there is threesome going on post #270985, but there are more than 3 characters.

Fact that three people are having mutual sex don't imply there are only three people on picture.

Also

but there's a duo happening as well.

No on post #277822 there is no duo happening. There are 5 characters there is group "happening". Duo is for two characters on picture this pic has more then two characters it's not duo.

Short version:
I don't like trio tag, but I still think, that even if trio tag would exist, implication about which is that thread is invalid. That's all.

I hope I didn't make any more fails in explaining myself.