Implicating cum_milking → penis_milking
Link to implication

Reason:

Approveded

I'd like to add an opinion, and I think this place should be correct:

I wanted to search through characters with a precise gender (male, female, herm, no gender), but I'll always end up without the one asked. For example, searching "female wolf" will not only show female wolves, but also pictures of male wolves with female characters. Maybe adding an "_[gender]" in the search tool and in character/species tags would be better and awesome. Of course, leaving the tag alone will accept any genders.

ChaosContrl said:
I'd like to add an opinion, and I think this place should be correct:

I wanted to search through characters with a precise gender (male, female, herm, no gender), but I'll always end up without the one asked. For example, searching "female wolf" will not only show female wolves, but also pictures of male wolves with female characters. Maybe adding an "_[gender]" in the search tool and in character/species tags would be better and awesome. Of course, leaving the tag alone will accept any genders.

female wolf solo

Peekaboo said:
female wolf solo

If by "solo" you mean alone, then that's not what I'm talking about. What I meant is in a picture, there's characters, and they have genders. What I'd like to see in the search tool, is a way to determine which gender the characters have.

For example, "wolf_male giraffe_female" would show pictures with both male wolves and female giraffes, not all male and female wolf and giraffe characters.

It could even be "Fluttershy_herm dragon_male avian_female", which would show hermaphrodite Fluttershy(s) with both male dragon(s) and female avian(s) pictures.

ChaosContrl said:
If by "solo" you mean alone, then that's not what I'm talking about. What I meant is in a picture, there's characters, and they have genders. What I'd like to see in the search tool, is a way to determine which gender the characters have.

For example, "wolf_male giraffe_female" would show pictures with both male wolves and female giraffes, not all male and female wolf and giraffe characters.

It could even be "Fluttershy_herm dragon_male avian_female", which would show hermaphrodite Fluttershy(s) with both male dragon(s) and female avian(s) pictures.

im fairly sure that this idea has been brought up and just dumped because it was impossible to make work or something.

ChaosContrl said:
I'd like to add an opinion, and I think this place should be correct:

I wanted to search through characters with a precise gender (male, female, herm, no gender), but I'll always end up without the one asked. For example, searching "female wolf" will not only show female wolves, but also pictures of male wolves with female characters. Maybe adding an "_[gender]" in the search tool and in character/species tags would be better and awesome. Of course, leaving the tag alone will accept any genders.

This has been brought up numerous times before, but unfortunately without rewriting the tagging system from scratch we don't have a whole lot of wiggle room to make something like this work. The implications for the tags are all handled manually and would have to be added to every character and species. Even then we would still have to go back and retag 600000+ images so that these searches would actually work (and it's already difficult to get simple gender tags on there to begin with).

This isn't to say that it isn't a good idea in theory, just that it's a massive undertaking that the system isn't well set up for (and would be a lot harder to maintain than we currently have).

For what it's worth, you can already narrow down a search to less than 2 pages with fluttershy herm, most of which you'll find is actually what you were looking for. If it isn't, there may not actually be much of it out there to find, and even a perfect tagging system won't help you there.

[...]you'll find is[...]

Ok, thanks anyway!

If someone was milking a penis-tentacle for cum, would that actually be cum milking? Would it be penis milking? Would this implication hold up in that case? Given, no examples of that sort of thing exist, that I know of, but I figured I'd ask anyway.

Clawdragons said:
If someone was milking a penis-tentacle for cum, would that actually be cum milking? Would it be penis milking? Would this implication hold up in that case? Given, no examples of that sort of thing exist, that I know of, but I figured I'd ask anyway.

Would this implication hold up in that case?

implication

Oh, so it was an implication. :|