The former implies the latter, even though according to the breast tiers description, they're mutually exclusive. Their strict wiki description has them as overlapping (with hyper being the higher end of huge) but I feel that treating them as separate is probably more useful for various reasons.

Yeah this is kind of a long standing issue with those. They've followed the implications hyper_* -> huge_* -> big_* under the reasoning that "hyper are still considered big" but I think they should probably be broken up sooner or later.

It's just kind of an odd system and I don't really think there's much of a reason for it anymore.

It's a problem with people being opinionated and wanting to forcefully change it to the size they think it is. By having all of the sizes implied to one another (at least as far as larger sizes are concerned), those fights are avoided.

Could just warn people who are unfairly changing it, but it's up to the upper Echelon.

one good thing about that system is that it makes blacklisting easier. i dont like bigger than average breasts but i can get rid of all of them just by blacklisting big_breasts. i dont have to blacklist separately every single size scale between hyper and big.

Mutisija said:
one good thing about that system is that it makes blacklisting easier. i dont like bigger than average breasts but i can get rid of all of them just by blacklisting big_breasts. i dont have to blacklist separately every single size scale between hyper and big.

Never thought about it like that. Hmm...

I'm starting to think that splitting them up might not be worth the effort, and that making a simple note on the wiki ("tagging-wise they actually imply each other...") might help clear things up.