nintendo and etc created by 9 6
  • Comments
  • So, with the addition of the no_homo tag, i now have a request.

    There is this pretty hot image of a griffon or some avian, a horsecock having been pulled from his rump and a word bubble from the owner of said horsecock going "What? What do you mean you're Straight?"

    I'm sure someone out there know what I'm talking about.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Daneasaur said:
    So, with the addition of the no_homo tag, i now have a request.

    There is this pretty hot image of a griffon or some avian, a horsecock having been pulled from his rump and a word bubble from the owner of said horsecock going "What? What do you mean you're Straight?"

    I'm sure someone out there know what I'm talking about.

    Oh yeah, I do.


























    Nah, I don't.






















    Okay, maybe I do.

    post #361051

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Daneasaur said:
    So, with the addition of the no_homo tag

    That tag is garbage and needs to be invalidated. Gay is gay, even if you say no-homo. It's only valid if you're saying something like, "I love, you bro, but no homo, just as a bro." As in, just platonic. No sex.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • easytogooglename said:
    Oh yeah, I do.

    thanks.

    Furrin_Gok said:
    That tag is garbage and needs to be invalidated. Gay is gay, even if you say no-homo. It's only valid if you're saying something like, "I love, you bro, but no homo, just as a bro." As in, just platonic. No sex.

    So we should just invalidate skin color and eye color and the Humor tag along with the lol comments tag?

    the no_homo tag allows for users to find content of characters partaking in m/m situation, but with a caption or something in said image of them being in denial about it, and the denial tag is shorthanded to imply orgasm_denial (if my memory serves me).

    I find it to be an amusing tag and the content under it interests me greatly as it IS a fetish.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • No_homo tag is important for No_Homo fetishists, so be considerate to furries that can only get off to 'No_homo' pics. Without it The No_homo fetishists would be lost to us and complaints of No_Homo intorance would arise.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • gerbilcheeks said:
    No_homo tag is important for No_Homo fetishists, so be considerate to furries that can only get off to 'No_homo' pics. Without it The No_homo fetishists would be lost to us and complaints of No_Homo intorance would arise.

    Satire... this day.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Well if the no_homo tag goes, what would we use?

    Homosexuality_denial?

    denial_of_homosexuality_but_possibility_of_bisexuality_with_heterosexual_preference?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Koei-kun said:
    Don't forget: Traps ARE gay.

    Technically. No. If a male likes to dress up as a girl but proceeds to not do any sexual activity, they simply like being feminine. They are not gay.
    Society messes this up because its "not socially acceptable".
    You arent gay you like scat, weird fetishes or furry porn, so why would traps be the same?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1