addison and devon (no harm no fowl and etc) created by sefeiren
Viewing sample resized to 90% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

If you enjoy No Harm No Fowl and you'd like to support it, visit the following links for more information:
https://inkbunny.net/submissionview.php?id=860564
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/20633060/

  • Comments
  • If human beings bonded with this level of depth and sincerity, there would never be another divorce on this planet...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • Daneasaur said:
    I'm gonna get downvoted like hell but I honestly don't care at this point.

    I really thought Sefeiren was gonna be better about the whole knotting thing, so it's incredibly disheartening and simply disappointing to see him fall into the whole "lol cram a softball in there and like it'll be stuck because I don't know biology".

    Moreover will be the frothing fanatics who will actively attack someone like me, but I've come to just expect it nowadays.

    He’s fucking her cloaca. That’s not how cloaca’s work. Nothing is supposed to be inserted into them at ALL, let alone a dick thats a quarter of the size of her entire body. And your biological concern here is that knots don’t actually get “stuck”?

    You may as well have pointed out that animals don’t really talk. It’s a pornographic comic. Meticulously precise realism isn’t exactly the highest priority. Besides, nothing in the comic even suggests that they’re stuck, only that he’s got a big fucking knot that stretched her to her limit and she barely squeezed it in - and again, that’s into a fucking cloaca, where nothing is meant to be inserted in the first place.

    So let’s leave the biology pedantry at the door and just watch some fictional characters get their fuck on, yeah?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 29
  • Daneasaur said:
    I know a bit more about cloacas than you do. Cloacas DO work like that, albeit not HAWK cloacas. She's structured more like an ostrich at this point, who DO have a penis and vagina and DO have penetrative sex.

    But my point is, this is falling into the same old situation as numerous images and comics before it, but it's taken far too long to do the same old-same old. This is "Better late than never" all over again with the reward being something I've seen done better elsewhere without as much frothing fanbase meat shield to defend it.

    Why do you think I get downvoted on these images? Because of the meat shield who cannot stand to hear their "lord and savior" isn't perfect and is stringing folks along for patreon bux, and when Sefeiren was asked "why the scenes seeming to be drawn out so long?" he BLOCKED the person who asked the question.

    But go ahead, continue to tell me how I'm wrong, downvote me, and circlejerk about topics I'm not even talking about.

    After all, Sefeiren can do no wrong and I'm just some random hater.

    The thing is, I checked out the knot button image link that was posted in the comments for the last page, and there you are complaining about how furries don't know as much about knots as you do. You're obsessed with this, you bring it up even when there's no anatomy for you to criticize. The mere mention of the word is enough to set you off.

    You're not a "random hater", you're unhealthily obsessed about this. People downvote you because they're tired of it. It's not that you alone have superior knowledge of canine anatomy, it's that you seem to have missed the fact that different artists take realism to different degrees, right down to often slapping human dicks on their characters.

    Try to understand this: People like it this way. Haven't you noticed the people posting their excitement in the comments when they expect that knotting is imminent? It's a method of pacing the encounter that many people like. The time to complain about a lack of realism was some time before an eagle was riding a wolf in the cowgirl position, realism is out the window at this point.

    Or better still, you could not complain at all and move on to something that was more to your taste. Then everyone can be happy. It's not like you had no warning it was going to go like this, it was handled the same way in family matters. Which was another comic with a slow, smoldering pacing.

    Speaking of pacing, about the suggestion that the people are somehow being "strung along" because the scenes are "drawn out too long"... Again, I don't know how to tell you this, but some people like something more than a quick fuck.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 23
  • Dislike_My_Comments~ said:
    WHY THE FUCK DID THIS COMMENT HAVE 4 DISLIKES. it funy jok I liek :D

    The same reason this one has 10 DISLIKES now... too much meat on that pun.

    Saying "And they're knot done yet!"
    would probably be funnier.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Daneasaur said:
    I think the art is quite nicely done.

    Good for you. Now since you've made clear that this isn't what you're looking for, I expect you to move on to artists that handle this the way you want to.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Nomad76 said:
    Good for you. Now since you've made clear that this isn't what you're looking for, I expect you to move on to artists that handle this the way you want to.

    I'm not even salty about that. I am/was mainly salty about the tagging and mis-labeling of the act.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Daneasaur said:
    I'm not even salty about that. I am/was mainly salty about the tagging and mis-labeling of the act.

    It's not mislabeled or mistagged. Accurate to "real world canines" or not, it is knotting.

    Furthermore, he isn't a "canine" in the same way that humans aren't monkeys. He's an anthropomorphic canine.
    It is reasonable to not expect his dick to behave exactly like a dog's. As far as anyone can tell, this is correct for the world of this comic.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Dunnno said:
    It's not mislabeled or mistagged. Accurate to "real world canines" or not, it is knotting.

    Furthermore, he isn't a "canine" in the same way that humans aren't monkeys. He's an anthropomorphic canine.
    It is reasonable to not expect his dick to behave exactly like a dog's. As far as anyone can tell, this is correct for the world of this comic.

    Then what is the correct tag for the alternate manner? You know, how ties are achieved?

    THAT is what I'm saying. I don't really mind or care that people choose to have this kind but it's currently impossible to look up the other kind due to people tagging and labeling it the exact same way.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Daneasaur said:
    Then what is the correct tag for the alternate manner? You know, how ties are achieved?

    THAT is what I'm saying. I don't really mind or care that people choose to have this kind but it's currently impossible to look up the other kind due to people tagging and labeling it the exact same way.

    The troubles of a niche fetish. See, a great deal of your fellow furries DO know that for the couple to actually get tied, it should only be biologically possible when both the male and the female are canine, because it’s not only the knot that makes that happen, it’s the vaginal sphincter found in female dogs. Both are required to “get stuck.”

    Thing is, nobody cares. If we were concerned about what’s biologically possible or accurate, we wouldn’t have golden eagles (not ostriches or emus) getting fucked in their cloaca like it was a vagina. We wouldn’t have girls getting fucked by anthro (or sometimes feral) horses, or other creatures with dicks so big it should reasonably kill them. Etc.

    The idea of getting stuck on your canine partners knot, powerless to remove him from you while he pumps you full of cum, is fucking hot. So we choose to ignore the biology and make it happen regardless.

    Unfortunately, that means no matter what name you come up with for it, searching for that name will bring up all manner of results where the female is not canine and therefore tying shouldn’t be possible. Like I said, troubles of a niche fetish. There’s not really a way to search for “biologically feasible tying/knotting” no matter what naming conventions we use. Because people are turned on by the whole “getting stuck” thing, no matter what name you call it or search for it by, you’ll find tons of images where it shouldn’t be happening but is happening anyway. Sorry, no way around that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Xeno_Prime said:
    The troubles of a niche fetish. See, a great deal of your fellow furries DO know that for the couple to actually get tied, it should only be biologically possible when both the male and the female are canine, because it’s not only the knot that makes that happen, it’s the vaginal sphincter found in female dogs. Both are required to “get stuck.”

    Thing is, nobody cares. If we were concerned about what’s biologically possible or accurate, we wouldn’t have golden eagles (not ostriches or emus) getting fucked in their cloaca like it was a vagina. We wouldn’t have girls getting fucked by anthro (or sometimes feral) horses, or other creatures with dicks so big it should reasonably kill them. Etc.

    The idea of getting stuck on your canine partners knot, powerless to remove him from you while he pumps you full of cum, is fucking hot. So we choose to ignore the biology and make it happen regardless.

    Unfortunately, that means no matter what name you come up with for it, searching for that name will bring up all manner of results where the female is not canine and therefore tying shouldn’t be possible. Like I said, troubles of a niche fetish. There’s not really a way to search for “biologically feasible tying/knotting” no matter what naming conventions we use. Because people are turned on by the whole “getting stuck” thing, no matter what name you call it or search for it by, you’ll find tons of images where it shouldn’t be happening but is happening anyway. Sorry, no way around that.

    Also because the male has to be flaccid when he goes in. Just saying. Not a winning proposition for furry artists to draw a dick that's only hard once it's fully encased in flesh.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Xeno_Prime said:
    The troubles of a niche fetish. See, a great deal of your fellow furries DO know that for the couple to actually get tied, it should only be biologically possible when both the male and the female are canine, because it’s not only the knot that makes that happen, it’s the vaginal sphincter found in female dogs. Both are required to “get stuck.”

    Thing is, nobody cares. If we were concerned about what’s biologically possible or accurate, we wouldn’t have golden eagles (not ostriches or emus) getting fucked in their cloaca like it was a vagina. We wouldn’t have girls getting fucked by anthro (or sometimes feral) horses, or other creatures with dicks so big it should reasonably kill them. Etc.

    The idea of getting stuck on your canine partners knot, powerless to remove him from you while he pumps you full of cum, is fucking hot. So we choose to ignore the biology and make it happen regardless.

    Unfortunately, that means no matter what name you come up with for it, searching for that name will bring up all manner of results where the female is not canine and therefore tying shouldn’t be possible. Like I said, troubles of a niche fetish. There’s not really a way to search for “biologically feasible tying/knotting” no matter what naming conventions we use. Because people are turned on by the whole “getting stuck” thing, no matter what name you call it or search for it by, you’ll find tons of images where it shouldn’t be happening but is happening anyway. Sorry, no way around that.

    Nomad76 said:
    Also because the male has to be flaccid when he goes in. Just saying. Not a winning proposition for furry artists to draw a dick that's only hard once it's fully encased in flesh.

    Right, if we wanted to go 100% accurate. I wasn't trying to say I wanted/needed 100% accurate. Heck, I'd be happy with the knot being little more than a small bulb that only swelled up when he was climaxing.

    But, eh, niche is niche.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Tricksta said:
    The same reason this one has 10 DISLIKES now... too much meat on that pun.

    Saying "And they're knot done yet!"
    would probably be funnier.

    yeah I should've just went with that... turns out mine got flagged for roleplaying (didn't fall under the exception rules even though I thought it did)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Daneasaur said:
    I'm gonna get downvoted like hell but I honestly don't care at this point.

    I really thought Sefeiren was gonna be better about the whole knotting thing, so it's incredibly disheartening and simply disappointing to see him fall into the whole "lol cram a softball in there and like it'll be stuck because I don't know biology".

    Moreover will be the frothing fanatics who will actively attack someone like me, but I've come to just expect it nowadays.

    Daneasaur said:
    I know a bit more about cloacas than you do. Cloacas DO work like that, albeit not HAWK cloacas. She's structured more like an ostrich at this point, who DO have a penis and vagina and DO have penetrative sex.

    But my point is, this is falling into the same old situation as numerous images and comics before it, but it's taken far too long to do the same old-same old. This is "Better late than never" all over again with the reward being something I've seen done better elsewhere without as much frothing fanbase meat shield to defend it.

    Why do you think I get downvoted on these images? Because of the meat shield who cannot stand to hear their "lord and savior" isn't perfect and is stringing folks along for patreon bux, and when Sefeiren was asked "why the scenes seeming to be drawn out so long?" he BLOCKED the person who asked the question.

    But go ahead, continue to tell me how I'm wrong, downvote me, and circlejerk about topics I'm not even talking about.

    After all, Sefeiren can do no wrong and I'm just some random hater.

    Oh hey look, another person with a dissenting (yet valid and well-founded) opinion getting downvote bombed because people saw the negative score and wanted to jump on it like everyone else.

    Seriously people. Downvotes are for actual shit comments like "first" or "obvious pun followed by apology", not silencing people you disagree with to reinforce your echo chamber.

    As for the actual point, I would at least like to see more (or any) anatomically correct male-canine-on-female-canine art given the biological details already mentioned regarding tying and vaginal sphincters, and it'd be great to have a proper way to search it separately, but in the meantime, as long as it's not a ridiculous organ-displacement/spatial-anomaly-level fit, I don't see that much problem with it. Quod erat demonstrandum, knotting is fukken hot.

    Frankly, I'm much more bothered by people who give non-mammals breasts.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ForThePlot said:
    Oh hey look, another person with a dissenting (yet valid and well-founded) opinion getting downvote bombed because people saw the negative score and wanted to jump on it like everyone else.

    Seriously people. Downvotes are for actual shit comments like "first" or "obvious pun followed by apology", not silencing people you disagree with to reinforce your echo chamber.

    As for the actual point, I would at least like to see more (or any) anatomically correct male-canine-on-female-canine art given the biological details already mentioned regarding tying and vaginal sphincters, and it'd be great to have a proper way to search it separately, but in the meantime, as long as it's not a ridiculous organ-displacement/spatial-anomaly-level fit, I don't see that much problem with it. Quod erat demonstrandum, knotting is fukken hot.

    Frankly, I'm much more bothered by people who give non-mammals breasts.

    Eh, as a whole, folks don't like me much here and I got downvoted for the reasons I stated in the comments you quoted.

    Expect this to go down too.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Daneasaur said:
    Eh, as a whole, folks don't like me much here and I got downvoted for the reasons I stated in the comments you quoted.

    Expect this to go down too.

    I mean to be fair expecting everyone to hate you probably isn't doing you any favors 😉

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ForThePlot said:
    I mean to be fair expecting everyone to hate you probably isn't doing you any favors 

    I find it better than expecting everyone to love everything I say.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Daneasaur said:
    Right, if we wanted to go 100% accurate. I wasn't trying to say I wanted/needed 100% accurate. Heck, I'd be happy with the knot being little more than a small bulb that only swelled up when he was climaxing.
    Same.
    But, eh, niche is niche.

    Same

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0