finnick and judy hopps (zootopia and etc) created by siroc
Viewing sample resized to 78% of original (view original) Loading...
  • Comments
  • She's already given in more than is reasonable and offered an uncharacteristic action, with a term it's kind of surprising she knows. And it's amazing she knows about this. Mass media really is limited in rural areas. Common tropes and osmotic learning are not the same. Just take the jack-off little toot-toot.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • While in the movie, Judy is shown to be intelligent, resourceful and able to out-hustle Nick, here she's a pretty inept negotiator.

    Finnick's original condition was "I want to fuck Zootopia's hero cop... right here in the back of this van". That wording keeps the deal to a pretty small set of options. Namely of the Tab A inserts into Slot B variety.

    Instead of holding Finnick to his crass, unimaginative wording and making him negotiate hard for anything else (ie oral, anal, etc). Judy counters with the "brilliant" tactic of offering Finnick thirty minutes of apparently unrestricted access to her body without placing any boundaries on the activities to be undertaken.

    Hopefully this version of Judy never finds herself in the position to be a hostage negotiator.

    Criminal: "back off cops or I'll kill the hostages"
    Judy: "How about we do a hostage swap? You let them go and I'll come in totally nude with a briefcase containing a million dollars in unmarked bills?"

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 21
  • I guess I understand why this is being done; there are a lot of 'break down the self reliant female' concepts in the fandom, and many people who seem to enjoy it, so it's bound to get watches and likes.

    But its so off character for Judy to act like this that it's quite jarring to try to relate this comic to the character it's based on. I'm fully expecting Nick to either be right nearby, or filming it all to sell later, throwing the concept of him and Judy being together under the bus right along with her personality.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • I feel people are taking things too seriously here. it's just a silly porn comic guys, there are many on this site where characters are out of character or doing dumb things. this comic is pretty much just for the porn, it's not meant to have a striking narrative like two certain other zootopia comics.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13
  • sorsin said:
    I feel people are taking things too seriously here. it's just a silly porn comic guys, there are many on this site where characters are out of character or doing dumb things. this comic is pretty much just for the porn, it's not meant to have a striking narrative like two certain other zootopia comics.

    You underestimate the unnecessary self-seriousness in Zootopia fans.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • rva98014 said:
    *snip* and from other pages

    Besides your points being valid, maybe you are thinking too much about it? I mean, it's a porn artist satisfying his customers by a way or another. I do like stories too, but 95% of all porn have bad dialog or logic, and in the end we all know it's secondary.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • sorsin said:
    I feel people are taking things too seriously here. it's just a silly porn comic guys, there are many on this site where characters are out of character or doing dumb things. this comic is pretty much just for the porn, it's not meant to have a striking narrative like two certain other zootopia comics.

    this is the only response to criticism I ever see. Who cares if its just porn, artist should want critiques on their work to get better. Else we would just be getting the same shit over and over again. Is some of the criticism little out there, sure always will have some, but most of it is valid. So why just settle for bad dialog/story when it could be better?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • renobunny said:
    this is the only response to criticism I ever see. Who cares if its just porn, artist should want critiques on their work to get better. Else we would just be getting the same shit over and over again. Is some of the criticism little out there, sure always will have some, but most of it is valid. So why just settle for bad dialog/story when it could be better?

    I disagree. Some of it is valid, most of it judges the characterization of Judy as if it needs to equal or exceed that of the movie, which is absurd and not valid at all.

    Artists making fan content are allowed creative liberty with characters. They don't have to be 100% accurate lest they be found "wrong".

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • now judy why would he even cut the deal if all your gonna do is give a handy? Fin has two perfectly good paws of his own if he wanted that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0