You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

  • Comments
  • Seeing as Vulpera are not young Worgen but a different species in their own right, the "cub" and "shota" (as well as other relating) tags shouldn't be appropriate here, should they?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • magrior said:
    Seeing as Vulpera are not young Worgen but a different species in their own right, the "cub" and "shota" (as well as other relating) tags shouldn't be appropriate here, should they?

    Tag what you see. If it looks like a cub, it gets tagged as cub. That five thousand year old dragon loli is still a loli, even at age five thousand

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • magrior said:
    Seeing as Vulpera are not young Worgen but a different species in their own right, the "cub" and "shota" (as well as other relating) tags shouldn't be appropriate here, should they?

    Both of the male characters are shota.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Gosh my headcanon 100% is that the worgen is into paws and she's using the vulps paw to take advantage of that

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I love how the little worgen looks like he's on the top of his senses.

    But shouldn't young and shota tags be returned? Not counting what Snowskau himself said ("tag what you see", after all), these characters do look much smaller than pandaren babe

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • the_little_critter said:
    shouldn't young and shota tags be returned? Not counting what Snowskau himself said ("tag what you see", after all), these characters do look much smaller than pandaren babe

    The Vulp could technically be fully grown, as they only get to like 4' but, well, the vulp is preetty small. That worgen definitely seems on the tinier side cuz they normally are larger than a pandaren by half a foot.

    And it's now that I realize we do have the shota tags on this post

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0