You can not view this image.

Parent: post #2807934 (learn more) show »

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Description
  • Comments
  • Hard to believe they recorded a dog man and a genderbent cat boy having sex to get this audio! Mad respect to the cameraman.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • owl26 said:
    Yeah probably would pass out too~
    Split the difference and go out in 20.

    Thirty is possible but you would need to be a women to be able to do that. They can have a pretty lengthy orgasm if pleasured right.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • can someone tell me everything the guy is saying? I can't really make everything out over the sound of all the sex happening XD

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Why was this flagged for deletion? It's not an "Inferior version" it's a Webm file with Audio, If Anything it's better!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • aub said:
    Why was this flagged for deletion? It's not an "Inferior version" it's a Webm file with Audio, If Anything it's better!

    Just gonna post the respond publicly as well in case someone else is confused still. Also as small rant because I would love to be able to just approve most audio edits without problems.

    Audio is basically irrelevant factor for us and posts with audio only are always deleted as irrelevant. Audio editors, VAs, etc. don't even get tagged as artists as we only tag visual artists.
    Because of this audio edits are kinda in weird position to begin with, but they can be accepted considering all other uploading guidelines are fulfilled.

    One thing I have noticed with audio editors is that 90% of the time, they just completely destroy the video they are handling, usually by altering the framerate and speed, usually altering original artists vision and introducing stutter and/or frame blending issues, but on top of that only using places like twitter which further destroys the quality of the content. At this point the edit is no longer at similar quality to original and no longer according our guidelines - and in most cases like this, even if it wasn't edit it would still be againts our overall quality guidelines.

    I did actually take a further look at the source animation and thought that maybe I could fix it somehow still, but the speed and framerate alteration seem to be super odd, so gave up on starting line and even artists own version the sound is out of sync with animation. I can try to give it another go if necessary, but currently at least the version that's provided in the source is not acceptable quality here and as such it was inferior quality to post we already have here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0