I thought this was a porn site but I guess not

I love how the descriptions says they are of consenting age, and then makes the theme rape.

>all characters are of consenting age

Doubt

and this is why we teach our kids the signs of a drug user. now that little girl will live out the rest of her short life as a fleashlight

>All characters are of consenting age!

:(

Characters are of consenting age my ass, also no sexual themes? You sir are not a very good lier haha.

Having Judy Hopps sell one of her underage siblings into sex slavery in exchange for drugs?

You, sir, can do directly to hell.

This may be a porn site, but that doesn't mean we have to act like savages.

Sometimes I feel bad this artist destroys the characters' personalities (as some people is very attached to them) but at the same time I congrat him for doing it sarcastically every time, even the nickname is sarcastic.

Based

All characters are of consenting age!

post #675554

aethelred said:
Having Judy Hopps sell one of her underage siblings into sex slavery in exchange for drugs?

I prefer to think she'll live out her life as a taste tester for Carrots For One meals, you can't tell me they don't need to hire one.

No sexual themes

Ah so this is a back alley meat market

I'd believe that kid on Xbox who told me he'd get me banned since his dad owns Microsoft more than I believe "No sexual themes" and "all characters are of consenting age."

baconass said:
I thought this was a porn site but I guess not

If this were a porn site, why would we have a "Safe" rating with thousands, if not tens of thousands, of images rated as such? And why would we have a mirror site that displays only everything on this site that isn't porn? Y'all downvoting Varker for saying it's not a porn site, but it's not. It's a site with porn on it.

aethelred said:
You, sir, can do directly to hell.

This may be a porn site, but that doesn't mean we have to act like savages.

We don't need to tell artists, living breathing human beings like you and I, to go to hell because they drew something that upsets your sensibilities. We don't have to 'act like savages' either.

nonono2 said:
Sometimes I feel bad this artist destroys the characters' personalities (as some people is very attached to them) but at the same time I congrat him for doing it sarcastically every time, even the nickname is sarcastic.

What ilovejudyhopps does to existing fictional characters is done by hundreds of artists every single day. There is no rule on the internet that fan works have to 100% match with the image presented in the movie. Some artists draw 'What if' scenarios, some bend things to make the fan work more interesting in one way or another, and some just draw kinks. It's really not a big deal. If you don't like what the artist does, just blacklist them.

All in all, a lot of really unnecessary comments in this image, just like always when it comes to the needlessly downvoted posts. I lose a lot of willingness to be nice when I come in and see massive downvotes on comments that just say "I like this", as is the case here.

Remember kids "Don't do drugs"

.....There was a point on this site where things like this wouldn't cause much of a stink, now people get uppity over the tiniest of issues. This IS just a drawing people, not like someone is handing a real child or even into something like this happening IRL. Geeze, you guys really need to take a step away from the computer and realize none of this is real, or that the artist would actually want something like this to happen IRL.

sei said:
.....There was a point on this site where things like this wouldn't cause much of a stink, now people get uppity over the tiniest of issues. This IS just a drawing people, not like someone is handing a real child or even into something like this happening IRL. Geeze, you guys really need to take a step away from the computer and realize none of this is real, or that the artist would actually want something like this to happen IRL.

people are stupid

>No sexual themes, all characters are of consenting age!

If this has no sexual themes then what's the point on stating that all characters are of consenting age?

They're pretty contradictory statements, i guess.

sexygriffon said:
What ilovejudyhopps does to existing fictional characters is done by hundreds of artists every single day. There is no rule on the internet that fan works have to 100% match with the image presented in the movie. Some artists draw 'What if' scenarios, some bend things to make the fan work more interesting in one way or another, and some just draw kinks. It's really not a big deal. If you don't like what the artist does, just blacklist them.

Easy man, I was just commenting how some feel personally attacked when their characters are portraid in different ways than they were originally done, and FYI, I don't use the blacklist to not miss stuff like this and its unevitable reactions. You are unnecessary mad over over unnecessary comments from who doesn't like the image or are downvoting.

I bet you would love to answer everyone bashing and reporting the cheese grater too.

sexygriffon said:
If this were a porn site, why would we have a "Safe" rating with thousands, if not tens of thousands, of images rated as such? And why would we have a mirror site that displays only everything on this site that isn't porn? Y'all downvoting Varker for saying it's not a porn site, but it's not. It's a site with porn on it.

We don't need to tell artists, living breathing human beings like you and I, to go to hell because they drew something that upsets your sensibilities. We don't have to 'act like savages' either.

What ilovejudyhopps does to existing fictional characters is done by hundreds of artists every single day. There is no rule on the internet that fan works have to 100% match with the image presented in the movie. Some artists draw 'What if' scenarios, some bend things to make the fan work more interesting in one way or another, and some just draw kinks. It's really not a big deal. If you don't like what the artist does, just blacklist them.

All in all, a lot of really unnecessary comments in this image, just like always when it comes to the needlessly downvoted posts. I lose a lot of willingness to be nice when I come in and see massive downvotes on comments that just say "I like this", as is the case here.

So who decides which opinions can be expressed? You? I bet its you, you little authoritarian wanker. Coming in with your superior mind, chastising us little people for daring to express an opinion you don't like.

Got bad news, my little martinet--the comments and votes are accessible to the whole mindless mob. So maybe you shouldn't read the comments or look at the scores, you might get your fee-fees hurt.

Ok, I don't like to call myself a moralist because this is a porn site and freedom of expression and blah blah blah ... but don't you think this is too much?
And for all those who make fun of those who do not like the image, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT YOUR POINT OF VIEW CAN BE TRANSMITTED AND THE REST CANNOT? AND WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU ARE OK? welcome to the internet in any case, here everything is public

Follow-up pic:
The shady wolf gets Judy's little sister addicted to Howler

I envy this wolf! I would give all my savings ($ 800) to get a little girly bunny for at least one night (if you know what I mean).

I wonder how many of her siblings she would be willing to sell to a shifty pred for more howler :woozy:

fredogodofredo18461 said:
Ok, I don't like to call myself a moralist because this is a porn site and freedom of expression and blah blah blah ... but don't you think this is too much?

"too much" is a pointless, subjective line-in-the-sand. One person's "too much" is another person's "tame". I definitely don't think we should use that as a measuring stick or rule-determiner in any way for fiction.

fredogodofredo18461 said:
And for all those who make fun of those who do not like the image, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT YOUR POINT OF VIEW CAN BE TRANSMITTED AND THE REST CANNOT? AND WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU ARE OK? welcome to the internet in any case, here everything is public

The rules we all agreed to. Or at the very least, for posts. I encourage you to check out tickets people submit sometime. "I don't like this" & "the viewer/artist has something wrong with them" type comments often get actioned. Usually under failure to blacklist.

"all characters are of consenting age"

Somehow, I doubt that very much. That dubious claim and the rather dark nature of the post aside though, this is actually a very good drawing. But it does make me crave to know what happens next. Dark themed posts like this can instill a lot of rather interesting comments whenever they are posted, but it's in my opinion a good thing to have a break from all the positivity and instead be served some good old, coldly realistic material.

aethelred said:
So who decides which opinions can be expressed? You? I bet its you, you little authoritarian wanker. Coming in with your superior mind, chastising us little people for daring to express an opinion you don't like.

Got bad news, my little martinet--the comments and votes are accessible to the whole mindless mob. So maybe you shouldn't read the comments or look at the scores, you might get your fee-fees hurt.

Telling the artist to go to hell is against the rules of the site, my dude. You can express your opinions without insulting people who just decided to draw something.

I like to think arguing in the comment section because of a sensitive topic is the hidden fetish in all this.

mentholtape said:
I like to think arguing in the comment section because of a sensitive topic is the hidden fetish in all this.

post #2664271

sei said:
.....There was a point on this site where things like this wouldn't cause much of a stink, now people get uppity over the tiniest of issues. This IS just a drawing people, not like someone is handing a real child or even into something like this happening IRL. Geeze, you guys really need to take a step away from the computer and realize none of this is real, or that the artist would actually want something like this to happen IRL.

I've been a member here since 2014, and actively searched the site since 2009. I can recall many fights and arguments here. In fact, what you see here, pales in comparison to what we have seen before. At one point, it got so bad, the site was nearly shut down.

fantasiifrittfall said:
I've been a member here since 2014, and actively searched the site since 2009. I can recall many fights and arguments here. In fact, what you see here, pales in comparison to what we have seen before. At one point, it got so bad, the site was nearly shut down.

Cool, I'v been here since 2009 and was here god knows how long before I actually made an account, I saw when this site was shut down and was brought back from the ashes..... Sure, people argued of things here and there but things only got bad during the MLP "wars" I only jest and just steadily got stupid from there. I'm not sure if you saying " In fact, what you see here, pales in comparison to what we have seen before. At one point, it got so bad, the site was nearly shut down. " is back when the ol MLP wars was happening Don't kill me, but thats the only time I can remember the comment section just being terrible.

sei said:
Cool, I'v been here since 2009 and was here god knows how long before I actually made an account, I saw when this site was shut down and was brought back from the ashes..... Sure, people argued of things here and there but things only got bad during the MLP "wars" I only jest and just steadily got stupid from there. I'm not sure if you saying " In fact, what you see here, pales in comparison to what we have seen before. At one point, it got so bad, the site was nearly shut down. " is back when the ol MLP wars was happening Don't kill me, but thats the only time I can remember the comment section just being terrible.

Bad Dragon buying it and bringing in real staff and rules really did save it

camkitty said:
Bad Dragon buying it and bringing in real staff and rules really did save it

Ya know, I was sure it was bad dragon... but didn't wanna sound dumb, so I didn't say that. Im tired and just got off work and my memory can be shit 75% of the time.

sei said:
Cool, I'v been here since 2009 and was here god knows how long before I actually made an account, I saw when this site was shut down and was brought back from the ashes..... Sure, people argued of things here and there but things only got bad during the MLP "wars" I only jest and just steadily got stupid from there. I'm not sure if you saying " In fact, what you see here, pales in comparison to what we have seen before. At one point, it got so bad, the site was nearly shut down. " is back when the ol MLP wars was happening Don't kill me, but thats the only time I can remember the comment section just being terrible.

The stuff I was talking about was back when the site was nearly taken down after facing severe allegations. The situation got so bad, that the site was taken down in 2007, and than again in 2010.

In both of these instances, the fact that E621 hosts material depicting underage characters were the source of the drama and the conflicts that arose. In 2010 it was primarily a third party that had no presence on the site which brought about its downfall, but I still do remember the intense discussions and arguments you could find both in comment sections and in the forums.

One great thing about E621, is that many of the posts and comment sections are still available, and can be viewed at any time. You can easily find arguments both on this topic, and many others, going as far back as the early days of E6. It has become more of a choir to find them after E6's administration changed the layout of the site, which seems to have caused glitches with the buttons that brings you back to the earliest posts, but they are out there. And this is before we even get into what I would find to be the most petty topic of all times on this site; that would be the great Lobster bans.

I don’t think I have seen a rating go this low this fast before.

This is sad

The real scary thing? This might end up being the fate of the rest of her siblings, as well as any other kids that she could get away with kidnapping.

woozle said:
I don’t think I have seen a rating go this low this fast before.

I think its because its such a popular series.
Thankfully, most artists that draw this sorta thing don't tend to give a shit about it/have a thicker skin atleast, knowing people will downvote bomb.

fantasiifrittfall said:
The stuff I was talking about was back when the site was nearly taken down after facing severe allegations. The situation got so bad, that the site was taken down in 2007, and than again in 2010.

In both of these instances, the fact that E621 hosts material depicting underage characters were the source of the drama and the conflicts that arose. In 2010 it was primarily a third party that had no presence on the site which brought about its downfall, but I still do remember the intense discussions and arguments you could find both in comment sections and in the forums.

One great thing about E621, is that many of the posts and comment sections are still available, and can be viewed at any time. You can easily find arguments both on this topic, and many others, going as far back as the early days of E6. It has become more of a choir to find them after E6's administration changed the layout of the site, which seems to have caused glitches with the buttons that brings you back to the earliest posts, but they are out there. And this is before we even get into what I would find to be the most petty topic of all times on this site; that would be the great Lobster bans.

>the great Lobster bans
The what now?
Been using this site for the better part of my life, and have never heard about these, what where they?

And reporting it does nothing, the mods rejected it. That tells a lot about the mods here. This crap user should be banned everywhere with his shit.

blackandwhitekat said:
I think its because its such a popular series.
Thankfully, most artists that draw this sorta thing don't tend to give a shit about it/have a thicker skin atleast, knowing people will downvote bomb.

>the great Lobster bans
The what now?
Been using this site for the better part of my life, and have never heard about these, what where they?

Well in short, there were a post over a decade ago which consisted of just a banner, featuring a lobster. Anyone who flagged this post, wound up getting permabanned by one of the staff at the time. Even just commenting about it anywhere on the site could get you banned apparently, but this I cannot confirm as it's just a rumor I heard floating about.

The post that got people banned can still be found on the site. It's the post that goes by the ID 83484. The warning left by the moderator who issued the bans is still there in the description.

spelter said:
And reporting it does nothing, the mods rejected it. That tells a lot about the mods here. This crap user should be banned everywhere with his shit.

Posting art that makes you go 'yucky!' isn't against the site's rules.

People downvoting are incapable to the point that they failed to realize that this picture is just a fiction. If that's not the case they must've really PTSDed from their childhood trauma.I feel sorry for them either way.

sexygriffon said:
If this were a porn site, why would we have a "Safe" rating with thousands, if not tens of thousands, of images rated as such? And why would we have a mirror site that displays only everything on this site that isn't porn? Y'all downvoting Varker for saying it's not a porn site, but it's not. It's a site with porn on it.

We don't need to tell artists, living breathing human beings like you and I, to go to hell because they drew something that upsets your sensibilities. We don't have to 'act like savages' either.

What ilovejudyhopps does to existing fictional characters is done by hundreds of artists every single day. There is no rule on the internet that fan works have to 100% match with the image presented in the movie. Some artists draw 'What if' scenarios, some bend things to make the fan work more interesting in one way or another, and some just draw kinks. It's really not a big deal. If you don't like what the artist does, just blacklist them.

All in all, a lot of really unnecessary comments in this image, just like always when it comes to the needlessly downvoted posts. I lose a lot of willingness to be nice when I come in and see massive downvotes on comments that just say "I like this", as is the case here.

Holy shit, go touch some grass!

sexygriffon said:
If this were a porn site, why would we have a "Safe" rating with thousands, if not tens of thousands, of images rated as such? And why would we have a mirror site that displays only everything on this site that isn't porn? Y'all downvoting Varker for saying it's not a porn site, but it's not. It's a site with porn on it.

We don't need to tell artists, living breathing human beings like you and I, to go to hell because they drew something that upsets your sensibilities. We don't have to 'act like savages' either.

What ilovejudyhopps does to existing fictional characters is done by hundreds of artists every single day. There is no rule on the internet that fan works have to 100% match with the image presented in the movie. Some artists draw 'What if' scenarios, some bend things to make the fan work more interesting in one way or another, and some just draw kinks. It's really not a big deal. If you don't like what the artist does, just blacklist them.

All in all, a lot of really unnecessary comments in this image, just like always when it comes to the needlessly downvoted posts. I lose a lot of willingness to be nice when I come in and see massive downvotes on comments that just say "I like this", as is the case here.

The comments might be unnecessary but even more so is this post.

goldenart121 said:
The comments might be unnecessary but even more so is this post.

Why would the post be unnecessary? If you ask me, it's just healthy to have dark and disturbing posts while at the same time keeping it SFW.

garnarch said:
I love how the descriptions says they are of consenting age, and then makes the theme rape.

Who says it has to be rape? Maybe he's going to eat her!

Almost a year later, I keep this in my favorites JUST to see how ratio'd it gets by critics the worldwide.

And just to reiterate.

No sexual themes

all characters are of consenting age!

Look, look, I don't wanna be a dick about this, but obviously I do.

sei said:
.....There was a point on this site where things like this wouldn't cause much of a stink, now people get uppity over the tiniest of issues. This IS just a drawing people, not like someone is handing a real child or even into something like this happening IRL. Geeze, you guys really need to take a step away from the computer and realize none of this is real, or that the artist would actually want something like this to happen IRL.

this site has been around 10+ years so there's a new gen of fur babies complaining about toon porn

No sexual themes...? All consenting ages..? Magic words don't make this not problematic as fuck.

baconass said:
I thought this was a porn site but I guess not

Technically this is a "furry art archival site" that allows porn. Doesn't always have to be porn.

iamv0id said:
I love how the descriptions says they are of consenting age, and then makes the theme rape.

Consenting age does NOT mean consenting

Really messed up