April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
[ Blacklist Help ]
You must be over the age of 18 and agree to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
Deltabeta
Memberhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XCNSHBea8k8&list=PL86YYQR-IhCD1HCtaYIkHRqOlIWQNU0vT&index=6
FiniteArrows She~Her
MemberThis makes me wonder. If a feral dog can consent, is it still technically bestiality?
Azero
MemberWell yeah, bestiality simply refers to the act with a feral animal, has nothing to do with consent.
FiniteArrows She~Her
MemberUnderstandable. But, would one face legal issues committing consensual bestiality with a dog that can verbally consent? Regardless of the fact that it's bestiality or not?
EmberKitsune
MemberI don't think law takes talking dogs into consideration
FiniteArrows She~Her
MemberYou're right. However this is set in a world where something like this happens very easily via the consumption of alphabet soup. Surely this has happened at least once in that world before, therefore the law should and probably would recognize it. but the question is, would it be allowed or disallowed in said world with said law?
Horizens
Member"very easily" you say, We're taking about the ONLY dog in the entire series to properly talk. however, I doubt most laws would even touch her. she is a singular outlier, the law may not even pay any attention to her. Doubt she'll get any worse then town rep involvement
dudode
Memberthings heating up in the martha speaks fandom
Dumbass Yogurt
MemberSo we’re having a discussion about martha speaks lore in a furry porn site huh? Interesting to see where the world has taken us to
VibrantLordiction
MemberWell, it's more valuable to society than arguing about politics.
Horizens
MemberYes, we are, because it's the most hilarious shit
Login to respond »