noctome and rika created by rika (artist)
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Hmmm, not seeing anything about a human on the source, but it does mention the two species being a ram and a dog.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Recursion said:
    Hmmm, not seeing anything about a human on the source, but it does mention the two species being a ram and a dog.

    Outside information is not relevant to tagging except for character and artist names.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • What we do know is that a female is being eaten out, and thus the female tag is needed. *adds tag* The creature's gender is unknown, and the ambiguous_gender tag is needed too.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Rika said:
    Since I know what's going on, I'll help you out with the tagging...

    That's not how the tagging rules work here.
    You don't tag what you know, you tag what you see in the image.
    For more info, please read the link here: twys

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Halite said:
    That's not how the tagging rules work here.
    You don't tag what you know, you tag what you see in the image.
    For more info, please read the link here: twys

    Ah, forgot to mention, if there is any further information you would like to add that isn't clearly visible in the image feel free to use the description instead of the tags.
    That's one of the big reasons the description part was added.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Halite said:
    That's not how the tagging rules work here.
    You don't tag what you know, you tag what you see in the image.
    For more info, please read the link here: twys

    Doesn't the ARTIST have the greatest say? I don't see anyone bitching at Savage for her tagging excellency on her OWN images. Just thought I'd make a small, but valid, point.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • FurriFanatiko said:
    Doesn't the ARTIST have the greatest say? I don't see anyone bitching at Savage for her tagging excellency on her OWN images. Just thought I'd make a small, but valid, point.

    No.
    You clearly didn't read the link.
    Your point isn't valid.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • DanDaMan97X said:
    If we have both characters, why is one still listed as ambiguous gender?

    AAAAARRRRGGGHHHH!

    twys

    Read it, read it now, do nothing else before reading it.
    It's the #1 rule of the website, if you want to discuss what should and shouldn't be tagged, you NEED to know and understand it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Okay I'll make it simple, it's female and ambiguous gender, as per the site's tagging rules. If the owner(s) insist on documenting the genders, add it to the description.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I haven't insisted anything besides the character's names. Ain't my site ain't my rules. All I ask is that it's credited to me and if it has my characters in it, that they are labeled.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • FurriFanatiko said:
    Doesn't the ARTIST have the greatest say? I don't see anyone bitching at Savage for her tagging excellency on her OWN images.

    Question, if savage is a good tagger, why would anyone bs about it, if I read your comment right..

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0