Cute

YES!!!! I'M EXCITED FOR THIS ONE \O/

Fur_rulz said:
Gay street dogs? That's the most impossible- one of the most impossible things I've seen. I have seen more impossible but.🙄

1. Furry porn
2. Male dogs fucking male dogs ain't that uncommon

fur_rulz said:
Gay street dogs? That's the most impossible- one of the most impossible things I've seen. I have seen more impossible but.🙄

That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard...Claiming something is impossible while on this image board. Jesus Christ

fur_rulz said:
Gay street dogs? That's the most impossible- one of the most impossible things I've seen. I have seen more impossible but.🙄

You are on E621, a site where insides are optional as the holes are quite often voids that can contain the size of anything and males are essentially a tap that can be turned on repeat as many times as required.
Nothing is truly impossible here.

fur_rulz said:
Gay street dogs? That's the most impossible- one of the most impossible things I've seen. I have seen more impossible but.🙄

Actually male dogs will sometimes mount other males. Usually it's as a way to show dominance over the other, but sometimes it can result from being pent up (like if they recently encountered a female in heat but didn't get to mount her), and in those cases they'll mount other males, too. Of course, there's no such thing as "gay dogs" in a human context because animals don't feel attraction in the same way we do, neither sexually nor emotionally

user_387586 said:
Actually male dogs will sometimes mount other males. Usually it's as a way to show dominance over the other, but sometimes it can result from being pent up (like if they recently encountered a female in heat but didn't get to mount her), and in those cases they'll mount other males, too. Of course, there's no such thing as "gay dogs" in a human context because animals don't feel attraction in the same way we do, neither sexually nor emotionally

That statement is also extremely dubious. The idea that human emotions, orientations, and neural architecture are entirely unique stem from the late 1800s through mid 1900s. There were a lot of very flawed studies and we basically had zero way of knowing what was going on in other species heads until fMRI became thing. That combined with the idea that we were "created in the image of [insert preferred diety]" led to the rather non-sensical assumption that a few percentage points of genetic difference produced an entirely different brain wiring. Logically that doesn't make sense, especially when you consider how long it took for biological brains to evolve in the first place, that there would be some huge structural and programmatic change in just a few million years. The reality is that such difference isn't necessary to explain human abilities, just a small variation in the ability to accept non-verifiable signals, resulting in indirect and multi-generational knowledge accumulation, is all that's needed.

Guys. How did you not notice I was joking???
"most impossible- one of the most impossible"
That was the joke, it was a "haha furry porn logic!"
Maybe I should've added a /j that was my fault.