Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #4026691 (learn more) show »
Description

Finally posting the full quick project, which I am sure some of you have been waiting for this for the past, well, nearly a month... didn't really plan on holding out this long, time sort of slipped on by, meant to post it only 2 weeks after posting the first bit, but better late then never I suppose, something I have been saying more and more with my rather terrible memory. The model (skin) is going to show up more often in future works, and will likely have a name, but don't have one yet, may ask those on Subscribestar and the other platform to vote for a name, who knows.

Also still trying to recover from things, nowhere near as bad as they have been from January to maybe early April, but still hanging around, and I guess allergies are playing a part in it now that spring has rolled around and summer is just nearing. Allergies hasn't been something I have dealt with before but seems to be a new thing for me, so learning to deal with that on top of other things.

More projects are on the way but been slow at getting things done do to work around the house and family, but hoping the next one wont take too long to do, and the next one after that until I get to the longer commissions. Lots of new stuff to look forwards to, once my slow ass gets to getting things done lol

Side note: This project was originally going to be a loop, then I decided to make a start and finish... then decided it should have internals, which when you make a project without internals in mind, it is quite difficult to add later on, and is the reason they are a little short, would have made them last a bit longer but would not have looked good, and had to choose best timing for them. Also have no clue why the under view, the lighting does that to her bits, was not able to figure it out since I have never had that issue before, but could be a session thing, could be a bugged model, don't know, but doesn't really ruin things I think at least. If it was a commissioned project I would have spent a lot more time trying to fix it but just know it looked way worse before I spent some time working on it.

My Subscribestar, where you can find early work in progress stuff, and early access to projects - https://subscribestar.adult/wolflandsfm
----------------------------------------
Please consider supporting me if you can, helps me get by and keeps me inspired to make content for everyone. I wouldn't be still doing what I do (as often) if not for the support I have had in the past, and any added support will help me out greatly in continuing my work and making content you guys want to see. Commissions also help a ton so if you want to have something commissioned, my Discord server has details you can look at before having something commissioned.

Discord - https://discord.gg/4WD5FJnjTs

Joining the discord server, you can:
- See commission details
- View other ways to support me and my work (also view early work)
- View work's in progress by me or other creators in the discord
- Make requests in what you would like to see
- Share content with others
- Chat with people about anything that doesn't violate server rules

(discord can be used through a browser if you do not want to download it if you do not already have discord)

  • Comments
  • Considering what outsiders presume of us, there's a lot less canine feral animations than you would think, so it's always good to see something that catches the eye! To then click and see it's by wolfland, has a slightly tweaked fem Dogmeat, has short before and after cute affection scenes, and has one of those nifty x-ray sections, basically singlehandedly made it worth me checking e621 tonight.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 24
  • akitokitsune said:
    I'm going to fucking kill myself

    That escalated quickly. Okay why? Are you dissatisfied with the work? There is more out there. You don't even have to look far, just tag surf on esix. You could get some ice cream, always makes me feel better, and significantly less suicidal.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • micwhaley said:
    That escalated quickly. Okay why? Are you dissatisfied with the work? There is more out there. You don't even have to look far, just tag surf on esix. You could get some ice cream, always makes me feel better, and significantly less suicidal.

    They are just a troll

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • BrainPow said:
    THIS IS LITERALLY JUST BEASTIALITY WHY IS THIS ALLOWED

    It's animated. Therefore, it's not real. Actual beastiality would be a real life dude fucking a real life dog. That's not what this is. There is nothing real about it. Put the "feral" and "human on feral" tags in your blacklist if you don't want to see anymore "beastiality"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 28
  • I always look forward to reading the hidden comments on these types of posts. People get so upset over things that aren't even real and for some reason refuse to use the blacklist feature. Keep up the good work Walfland

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • brainpow said:
    THIS IS LITERALLY JUST BEASTIALITY WHY IS THIS ALLOWED

    This isn't "literally just bestiality". This is fictional art involving fictional characters. Now, if this was real life porn of a guy actually fucking a real life dog, then yes. That would be literally bestiality and therefore not allowed. Though like someone said already, if it bothers you that much: put the "Human_on_feral" tag on your blacklist and you'll never see stuff like this again.

    Though, to be fair...the thumbnail clearly shows a feral dog being pet by a human and the post is clearly marked as "Explicit" so it's safe to assume you knew what you were getting into when you clicked to view the piece in the first place.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 16
  • CutieCake said:
    Stuff like this is why people hate us furries 🗿

    Because you can't shut up about fictional characters doing things to each other within a fictional setting? If people want to whine about fictional things, that's their problem, not ours.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • gorradon_the_dragon_ said:
    Exactly. The amount of closeted zoophiles trying to defend this filth is staggering

    What is staggering is the amount of people who assume if you like the virtual thing, they must like the real thing... You do know it is quite possible to like one thing, but not the other? Another staggering thing is the amount of people who just don't know how blacklists work. It is a wonderful thing actually, if you put tags you don't want to see in there, suddenly you no longer see the things you don't want to see. I highly recommend using it so you don't feel the need to waste people's and your own time in being negative in comments of someone's hard work. :)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • wolfland said:
    What is staggering is the amount of people who assume if you like the virtual thing, they must like the real thing... You do know it is quite possible to like one thing, but not the other? Another staggering thing is the amount of people who just don't know how blacklists work. It is a wonderful thing actually, if you put tags you don't want to see in there, suddenly you no longer see the things you don't want to see. I highly recommend using it so you don't feel the need to waste people's and your own time in being negative in comments of someone's hard work. :)

    Don't listen to the haters, you're doing the hottest content ever, keep it up<3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • > Open e6 without logging in

    > Run across this via the lol_comments tag

    That'll teach me not to skip the login process.

    (Sidenote: If anybody knows why bestiality isn't covered by the "global blacklist"/help/global_blacklist, please tell me.)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -10
  • gorradon_the_dragon_ said:
    Found the dogfucker in denial

    the fact you came back to this post makes me believe you actually do like this content and just seem negative about it to make yourself feel better. I wont judge, nor should anyone else. I spoke fact and truth, and if you can't handle that, I strongly suggest you utilize your blacklist or just not click on things you know you don't like... or maybe you do like it ;)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • canine_in_heatz said:
    Don't listen to the haters, you're doing the hottest content ever, keep it up<3

    They get upset over literally nothing, and when you say one thing, they simply refuse to accept it and choose to believe what they want to believe, and you can't change that. I don't take offence reading negative comments, most of them are just trolls with nothing better to do with their lives, and are more then likely on these sites viewing much worse things in regards to the type of content they clicked on to get here. I find it entertaining that people still want to be negative about what they clicked on because they don't know how to use a blacklist or unaware of its existence, or try to make themselves feel better about actually enjoying the content they just watched like that one guy who has now been warned twice. I truly believe they must really enjoy this sort of thing for having come back to it, and if that isn't the truth, it is what I choose to believe, same with them and their thinking which they made quite clear to everyone, what they choose to believe over actual fact. But oh well, gives me some entertainment and doesn't bother me one bit, and wont change anything.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • gorradon_the_dragon_ said:
    Exactly. The amount of closeted zoophiles trying to defend this filth is staggering

    The amount of idiots who cannot tell the difference between fiction and reality is staggering as is the high number of idiots who don't use their blacklists to avoid content they don't like. What's even more sad is that the first few pages of your favorites has art of ferals or non-ferals having sex with ferals. By your narrow minded outlook of people that like art of ferals are zoophiles, you'd be including yourself too.

    wolfland said:
    I don't take offence reading negative comments, most of them are just trolls with nothing better to do with their lives, and are more then likely on these sites viewing much worse things in regards to the type of content they clicked on to get here.

    Good on you, and keep up the awesome animations/art.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • vqrwqyvvwvv9 said:
    is that not pretty much a safe bet? Whether you'd be doing it irl is a different matter altogether (that afaik is not allowed to be discussed on e6), but I find this type of "well ackchually" that invariably happens under this type of content incredibly tiring in its dishonesty. You're stroking your dick to a pretty realistic animation of a male human fucking a female dog. There is no transformative fantasy setting here. This is animated porn for zoophiles.

    We can talk about how having certain fantasies doesn't make us bad people as long as we don't act on them, or how every fetish should be allowed to be indulged in as long as nobody is being hurt, and how the rise of computer animation and AI could give safe outlets for certain fetishes...
    But let's not act like this is not zoophile porn. It is. Everything else is just being dishonest.

    Please allow me to inform you that zoophile and zophilia applies to the sexual attraction and or sexual fantasy of a real animal. I am sorry to tell you there is nothing real here, and in my case at least, no sexual attraction to a real animal (which I am sure you and Gorradon simply wont believe so I am just wasting my time). Fantasy doesn't NEED to be completely make belief in order for it to be a "proper" fantasy. They can be as realistic as whoever is thinking about it, wants to be, and if you don't like that, it is you who needs to change. It is wrong of you to simply claim what has been said is a lie to best suit your way of seeing things. Yeah, you right about one thing, if people don't actually do these IRL, then there is no reason to get upset about it as it isn't hurting anyone or anything, but you also need to accept that not everyone who enjoys this sort of virtual, 3d, animated work, is into the real thing as well. The sort of mindset of thinking everyone must like this thing because they like this other thing is toxic, and flat out wrong.

    I am aware that what I am saying will likely just go in one ear and out the other so to speak, but to just come to a site for this sort of content and many other types of content, and start accusing people of something when you know nothing about them, and refuse to listen to anything said to favour your own beliefs, then maybe find somewhere else to go, or utilize that blacklist everyone has access to so you can avoid seeing content you may not like and for some reason feel compelled to complain about it in the comments. That is not just directed at you, but for others as well.

    gorradon_the_dragon_ said:
    Excuse me but how are dragons and literal dogs anywhere alike? One is depicted in *fantasy* as having more intelligence than even humans, and the other has the mental capacity of a literal toddler and is *real* not fiction. Also I see you can spew insults and not get a warning but if I say what’s on everyone’s mind that isn’t a dog rapist I get a warning. Nice to see what side of the fence e6 staff is on.

    What you are saying is what is on your mind and what you believe, because you simply refuse to accept any other truths that have been said. You keep getting warned because you are being nothing but toxic. You come in e6, and click on a post you don't, and then start accusing everyone of being "closeted zoophiles" who try and make you aware of some truths that you simply can't accept, continue to spew toxicity and wonder why you have been warned several times. You clearly are very much closed minded and that's not likely ever going to change. Fantasy, as I said above, does not need to be entirely make belief, to clarify on that, it does not have to contain completely made up creatures and beings in order for it to be called a fantasy. Fantasies can be made up of completely made up places and beings, or they can be of real places, and real people or beings. In this case, which should have been quite obvious on first glance, has a not real man, and a not real female dog, in a not real house, which has not real trees and not real terrain, all inside a not real sky box which floats in a not real virtual black void.

    Now I know you secretly like this sort of thing, and that is perfectly ok, but to put on a show to try and make yourself feel better about it is not the way to go about it. Fantasies are perfectly healthy no matter what it is about, as long as you know better then to act on them, which I trust you can do. You've come back several times now so to me it really seems to do enjoy it, which I am happy for you, but you just need to work on the whole being toxic in the chat to make yourself feel better. Is what I said not true? Sure it is, because I believe it to be true, so it must be true, and no matter what you may say, I will see it as a lie and continue to believe you enjoy seeing virtual men doing nice hard lovely vaginal to a needy desperate female canine who has been waiting a long time for her human lover to fill her full of his hot steamy juices. - Enjoy that last part Gorradon, I wrote it just for you :)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • gorradon_the_dragon_ said:
    Fucking preach. This shit doesn’t belong in the fandom, there’s nothing done to “furrify” it, it’s literally just porn to help sick people act out their sick fantasies. We shouldn’t be allowing it, sick of the fandom becoming more welcoming to people like this. Fucking ban me e6, prove me right

    I guess you win, you got banned. But since we don't have to deal with you either, it's kind of a win-win isn't it?

    Stop fighting on this post. Shit on people who enjoy this content quietly and get banned. Admit or advocate for zoophilia, get perma-banned.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • vqrwqyvvwvv9 said:
    is that not pretty much a safe bet? Whether you'd be doing it irl is a different matter altogether (that afaik is not allowed to be discussed on e6), but I find this type of "well ackchually" that invariably happens under this type of content incredibly tiring in its dishonesty. You're stroking your dick to a pretty realistic animation of a male human fucking a female dog. There is no transformative fantasy setting here. This is animated porn for zoophiles.

    We can talk about how having certain fantasies doesn't make us bad people as long as we don't act on them, or how every fetish should be allowed to be indulged in as long as nobody is being hurt, and how the rise of computer animation and AI could give safe outlets for certain fetishes...
    But let's not act like this is not zoophile porn. It is. Everything else is just being dishonest.

    That's the issue...it's treating everyone that likes fictional art as sexual monsters. Yes, the animation contains a feral dog. But at the end of the day, it's an animation and not real. The problem is treating something that is fake and like it's real. Just because someone comes on here and looks at art of feral animals doesn't mean they are going to go out an fuck the next dog they see. The same for if someone looks at cub art on here. It doesn't mean they are going to go run out and start diddling little kids on the street.

    Now, I'm not saying that those types of people don't exist and I'm not defending people who go out and and force themselves on animals or kids. People who do that should be buried under the prison and left to rot. I'm merely saying there is a big difference between fictional art and real life. Yes, dogs are real but in this animation, it not real. And the moment when people like you can tell the difference between "real" and "fake," this commuity would be a better place.

    And let's all face the fact that everyone here with a rational functioning brain would much rather someone come here and get their rocks off to a bunch of animated pixels on a screen rather than go out and try to live out their twisted fantasies in real life.

    Updated by Rainbow Dash


    User received a warning for the contents of this message.
  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • bluemonday0621 said:
    > Open e6 without logging in

    > Run across this via the lol_comments tag

    That'll teach me not to skip the login process.

    (Sidenote: If anybody knows why bestiality isn't covered by the "global blacklist"/help/global_blacklist, please tell me.)

    Because there is plenty of anthro on feral that is labeled as bestiality. Do you not like to see an anthro getting fucked by a feral body style creature?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Apparently, there are still imbeciles who cannot tell the fucking difference between animation and reality, so let me spell it out for you idiots. Watching an animated video of a man fucking a dog is in no way equivalent to watching a real-life man fuck a real-life dog. Most of us have a moral compass that draws the line at hurting real-life animals, and we know that actual bestiality hurts animals because we know they cannot consent. Yes, there are people who would actually fuck their dogs, but they are in no way representative of the furry community as a whole and are seen by us as absolute monsters, as I'm sure you see them as well. An animated video, on the other hand, hurts a grand total of zero real-life animals. Enjoying this video, while knowing that all characters in it do not actually exist, isn't immoral, isn't a sign of zoophilia, and isn't hurting anyone, canine or otherwise. I am so sick and tired of spelling it out for you morons. It's the same deal with cub stuff, rape stuff, etc. It. isn't. real.

    Updated by Rainbow Dash


    User received a warning for the contents of this message.
  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • If people who like feral porn are zoophiles, then why aren't people who play GTA or GoW serial killers? Both are entertainment, for different purposes but still entertainment.

    People with common sense can tell the difference of fiction and reality, that's what separates us from these monsters. Plus, being a fantasy, you don't know if the animal shown can't consent, after all characters like Rocket Raccoon and Yuumi are animals that can talk, think and consent. Give it the Harkness test, to simplify

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • You know that meme where the guy suits up in a hazmat suit and goes through a door that says "comment section"? That can be used for this post lol. Seriously though, Wolfland. You're doing an amazing job. Don't let these fatherless asshats tell you any different. The only thing they accomplish is clogging up a comment section. Literally no other purpose to them. Anyway, love the work you do, and I look forward to more posts! And you can certainly expect trouble in the comments for each one, but you'll always have people to fight them back. ❤️

    Updated by Rainbow Dash


    User received a warning for the contents of this message.
  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • gorradon_the_dragon_ said:
    Fucking preach. This shit doesn’t belong in the fandom, there’s nothing done to “furrify” it, it’s literally just porn to help sick people act out their sick fantasies. We shouldn’t be allowing it, sick of the fandom becoming more welcoming to people like this. Fucking ban me e6, prove me right

    You never learn...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Everyone is so mean and hostile in these comments ;w;
    It breaks my heart </3
    we should just accept our differences and move on ^w^

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Whenever i come across this type of content i feel like its a game of how long until i see "this user has received a warning for the contents of this message" since its pretty much always there

    Oh and a reminder of the comment i posted a while back here: last i checked, those are still just models moving

    Anyway yall have a good day now. Imma go get some watermelon and mangos

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • schwnnbenedict said:
    that's the equivalent of saying that drawn CP isn't fucked up because its just pixels.

    making art is expression of what a person wants in act, or what they desire to do, otherwise, its a commission or a banana taped to a wall.

    So if someone made an action scene of a character killing another character, does that mean that the artist wants to kill someone irl?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1