ThisIsSomeDude said:
If it still holds true, images with no visible genitalia can still be tagged with a gender if the one in it has features most commonly associated with female or male.

In this case, eyelashes are usually on females.

I don't know what planet that you live on, but here on Earth, males have eyebrows too. Human males tend to have longer eyebrows, in fact.

ThisIsSomeDude said:
If it still holds true, images with no visible genitalia can still be tagged with a gender if the one in it has features most commonly associated with female or male.

In this case, eyelashes are usually on females.

Well males have eyelashes too, and some have even been known to have eyes to match. Don't tag what you can't confirm.

Tagging what I see. This is 2014 people, wake up.

No character assigned + no genitalia shown = ambiguous.

OneMassiveLoad said:
No character assigned + no genitalia shown = ambiguous.

I only tagged it as female because Slugbox has them as "lesbian twins". He's also put female as the gender on FA.

Juni221 said:
I only tagged it as female because Slugbox has them as "lesbian twins". He's also put female as the gender on FA.

This is e621. We do different.

OneMassiveLoad said:
This is e621. We do different.

fail.

The source says "goodra sisters", therefore females.

VividNorth said:
The source says "goodra sisters", therefore females.

Tag rules STILL state: Tag what you see. Source material is completely irrelevant. It has been like this for the past few years and still people say this kind of shit.

OneMassiveLoad said:
No character assigned + no genitalia shown = ambiguous.

Not how it works.
...otherwise we couldn't tag gender for anyone who's wearing clothing.

If it seems feminine, tag it as female. Ambiguous_gender is often overused.

Genjar said:
Not how it works.
...otherwise we couldn't tag gender for anyone who's wearing clothing.

If it seems feminine, tag it as female. Ambiguous_gender is often overused.

Overused? You're not understanding. The sites rules are 'tag what you see'. Plus, news flash, guys can wear females clothing. See no Dick? See no awful pussy? Breasts? Ambiguous gender. End of story.

OneMassiveLoad said:
Overused? You're not understanding. The sites rules are 'tag what you see'.

If it looks feminine, it's tagged as female. Ambiguous is for characters that look androgynous, or have mixed features. As explained in the wiki entry of ambiguous_gender.

Same principle as disembodied penii, which are tagged as male: those might potentially be herms or dickgirls, but we only tag what can be seen.

The face looks feminine and nothing else is visible? Tag as female.

Genjar said:
If it looks feminine, it's tagged as female. Ambiguous is for characters that look androgynous, or have mixed features. As explained in the wiki entry of ambiguous_gender.

Same principle as disembodied penii, which are tagged as male: those might potentially be herms or dickgirls, but we only tag what can be seen.

The face looks feminine and nothing else is visible? Tag as female.

Ok first of all Ambiguous gender is used if the the gender is unidentifiable and in this case it is unidentifiable so therefore ambiguous gender is correct. Feminine features could be on a male as well so no feminine features are not good reason to tag as female just look at sashabelle's sasha little male furry who look ALOT like a female but in all actiuality a male with very feminine features if looked at from only the waist up could easily be mistaken as female so ambiguous gender would fit well enough if the character was unknown as are these. </end rant>

Love how all the comments were arguing about how to tag, while i'm here in the future just enjoying this great pic.