Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.
Dec 1st: If your account has been hit in the most recent ban wave of compromised accounts please reach out to us at management[at]e621.net and we'll help you get your account back.
If you've already contacted us give us a moment to get to you, though if it takes longer than a day for us to get back to you do feel free to reach out again!
Dec 2nd: If you got got and suddenly aren't able to see any of our exquisite selection of sausage and taco posts double check that Safe Mode is disabled in your account settings (Account -> Settings -> Safe mode [right above the blacklist text box]).
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.
Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.
SnakeWildlife
MemberJust seems a shame to stain such good art, with these number overlays. When people look back in, say for example a years time.... it wont mean anything.
This poor piece of good work is marked forever :{
Such a poor trend...
bayzul
MemberArtificial growth than passion
Cyborgcat
MemberIn a age of digital art it's frankly not actually a problem, artist can just put the numbers on it's own layer and once the initial drive is over they can just publish versions of the art without it.
Lunasussy
Memberits not that big of a deal dw homie
SnakeWildlife
MemberSadly i dont see thst happening within this trend
Grayfurrydick
MemberAbout a year has passed.
Honestly it's not that bad, while it does certainly show a piece of art is from a certain era of the internet, that's not really a problem.
Like it's kinda cool to look back at the hype a piece generated.
Login to respond »