News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

anon, naomi, naser, trish, fang, and etc (yiik: a postmodern rpg and etc) created by cavemanon, ko op, and third-party edit
Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted (0)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • silvanx said:
    Nice one, but for feal though your comment just proved my point.

    I really don't get the mockery and as much as i like snoot game i cannot see it as something else other than an anti-fan parody game (l don't mean that as an insult in any way) that became it's own thing which is okay by me, but let's not pretend there is no hostility and contempt between the SG fanbase and the official game.

    Wait, GVH has a genuine fanbase?
    Does anyone really care about that game?
    Snoot Game: Ending one is very intense (which I couldn't stop crying about). On the other hand, the endings 3 and 4 are to cry but of happiness.

    GVH: has one final and It's meh, bordering on mediocre.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • wolfnanaki said:
    Good to know that the staff of this site supports an anti-trans game made as part of an attack campaign against a queer indie studio.

    You know what, I think you had too much twitter(x) for the day to care so much about GVH being the butt of a joke.

    I don’t know what’s hard to be that of a decent human being to take a little jabs here and there. ” haha, very funny guys, yeah gvh is the butt of the joke and stuff” but instead you’re just being annoyingly pessimistic.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • Playing Snoot Game : free.

    Snoot Game having better writing than GVH : priceless.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • wolfnanaki said:
    Good to know that the staff of this site supports an anti-trans game made as part of an attack campaign against a queer indie studio.

    lol, lmao even

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • silvanx said:
    Look man obviously this is just my opinion so you can ignore this:

    I'm not talking about what game is better (i'm aware snoot game is better as a visual novel) what i'm trying to say is that snoot game's fanbase loves clowning on gvh simply because "SG good/GVH bad haha funny" and your comment as well as the others prove my point, if people really didn't care about gvh then no one would be making jabs at it cue my first comment.

    So all in all to summarize what i meant to say is this: Can't this fandom be chill with GVH/KO_OP and give them a break?

    Considering the fact that ko_op shunned the parody, hypothetically got someone on kotaku to write a hit piece on snoot game, and then wolf Nanaki here as “GVH’s strongest defender” and upset that Snoot Game is getting a larger audience than GVH. And the fact that playing their game was a total letdown of what we hoped for.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • masty_surperi0r said:
    Considering the fact that ko_op shunned the parody, hypothetically got someone on kotaku to write a hit piece on snoot game, and then wolf Nanaki here as “GVH’s strongest defender” and upset that Snoot Game is getting a larger audience than GVH. And the fact that playing their game was a total letdown of what we hoped for.

    "At this point, the universe takes two paths: one in which [KO_OP] spearheads a bold, artistic movement in game design as [...] misunderstood genius[es], burdened with the egotism that often strikes the auteur; or [KO_OP] is forever lambasted as [boobs] so massive that even the most determined baby would struggle to get its gob around it. And which universe we ended up with hinged on one thing: [Goodbye Volcano High] not being a pile of execrable garbage. Better luck next time, universe!"

    - Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • Both games are good. If I have two 100 dollar bills, one is good looking and one is ugly looking. Does the value of the ugly note be less in the market? Of course not, because its not about looks. Its about how much they're worth in the eyes of gamers that play them.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • auvinen said:
    Both games are good. If I have two 100 dollar bills, one is good looking and one is ugly looking. Does the value of the ugly note be less in the market? Of course not, because its not about looks. Its about how much they're worth in the eyes of gamers that play them.

    That analogy falls flat and sounds like something a rhinorex would say. Divorce it from your statement; it makes it sound insincere.

    And you're right, it isn't about looks. 'Cause if it were, then hands down, it'd go to the VN with VA work, fully-animated characters, and hand-drawn backgrounds, right? Right.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Poor Sage. He has to represent GVH because he didn't has enough info on him to get into Snoot Game. I wonder what he would've been like had he made it

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.