This better blow up, this is some S tier stuff

sammyffan said:
This better blow up, this is some S tier stuff

Yup, the quality goes super hard ~

Absolutely perfect Fidget~ <3

is this ai assisted like the last one?

gold-ratfucker said:
is this ai assisted like the last one?

Yes. I've just uploaded the referenced AIGC picture to rule34 for documentation,
but it wasn't approved yet:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9271564

ImgBB:
https://ibb.co/D5RG6mX

I shall also tag this picture as AI Generated then.

May I have a conversation here?

I only used an AIGC picture here as a reference. The picture itself was 100% hand painted from the ground up -- (not even a paint-over).

Is this still considered to be "AI generated"? Should I tag with "ai_generated" for this kind of picture in the future?

If it is only considered "AI assisted", do I need to tag such pictures with "ai_generated"?

I understand your concerns about AIGC, I just wanted to know where the acceptable boundary is, and I shall try to use a more ethical approach.

I'm capable of drawing a picture from ground up, without referencing AI and other artists work. But I find "mimicking manually and faithfully" (not direct copy-paste or paint-over) to be a very effective way to learn.

The only reason for me posting on e621 is to share the by-products of my art exercises. My only goal is to improve my skills.

Please have my sincere apology for the confusion. I think I should have described my approach from the beginning, not after other people brought it up. I think I let my ego getting in the way.

Please let me know your opinions!

Any chance this will be reposted on a site with less terrible rules? Was disappointed to scroll down to the source and find it blank, and can't find art from this artist anywhere else.

phyrx said:
Any chance this will be reposted on a site with less terrible rules? Was disappointed to scroll down to the source and find it blank, and can't find art from this artist anywhere else.

Our rules are more than fair.

Go to e6ai.net if you want AI content.

This image is obviously not AI generated nor AI assisted. The mods have made a blatant mistake. Absolute love this author's work and their attitude toward art in general, they are a huge inspiration.

halpenstance said:
This image is obviously not AI generated nor AI assisted. The mods have made a blatant mistake. Absolute love this author's work and their attitude toward art in general, they are a huge inspiration.

I agree. The author even specifically said that the drawing was made from the ground up, they just looked at an AI picture as a vague reference. It's sad to see poor moderation push away such fantastic hard work.

Rainbow_Dash said:

phyrx said:
Any chance this will be reposted on a site with less terrible rules? Was disappointed to scroll down to the source and find it blank, and can't find art from this artist anywhere else.

Our rules are more than fair.

Go to e6ai.net if you want AI content.

This comment is AI assisted

lamirie said:
I agree. The author even specifically said that the drawing was made from the ground up, they just looked at an AI picture as a vague reference. It's sad to see poor moderation push away such fantastic hard work.

if the reference was just vauge it wouldnt have looked like ai lol