April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Phenomania
MemberI think this might get them fired
catcafe
Memberwikihow
DirtyRatMatt
MemberNah, they'll be fine.
Terato-Enjoyer
Memberjust bros being bros
weaselsmasher
MemberThat thar's some high-quality buttsexin'.
WindthorPryas
MemberI will be forever convinced that these two are canonically gay, at least with each other.
It's not the healthiest relationship but that's my assertion.
Electralight
MemberNah they just need to keep quiet. And hey, can't moan too loud if they start making out.
Pump-A-Rump
MemberMordecai and Rigby stop pumping loads into eachother's asses and hose down the front porch or you're FIRED!
XXXMisterXXX
MemberDrei Teile Dacad hat sich wieder einmal selbst übertroffen.
G0ob a
MemberNew dacad post 🙏
cosmicpanda
Memberour king has come home 👑
SentientChoppa
MemberWhen dacad makes birb posts it's the BEST!
Horsey404
MemberPops is the only other dude in the house and that guy is higher than arboreal giraffe pussy so he ain't gonna care.
Waluigiwin
MemberYOU KNOW WHO ELSE IS FIRED
FuzzyAl
MemberNo he has the mix of a brain tumor from a old cell phone and brain damage from being run over by the in the past.
RandomLazyUser
MemberYoung tag makes no fucking sense
FurryArtLovah
MemberAnd the young tags were locked by an admin, I think there's no changing them now.
cyberbeans
MemberAh yes, the underaged 23-year old
Kadorath
MemberYeah, TWYS is supposed to help make the tagging system useful for finding or blacklisting works that contain the tagged thing, which I generally think is great, but 'young' feels like a misleading tag here. I guess some mod tagged what they saw, but I clearly don't see what they see, because it feels miscategorized. The tags don't feel like they're actually referring to this gif. Like if someone tagged 'gore' on this post or something. It kind of just undermines the tagging system.
FurryArtLovah
MemberTWYS is a good idea, but the admins are extremely inconsistent while using it.
ReverseSixtyNine
MemberThis doesn't look young to me even by "tag what you see" standards. Are mods just salty at Dacad at this point?
Like, Rigby's hips are literally as wide as Mordecai's. In what way is that young?
Kadorath
MemberYeah, if we actually are purely tagging what is seen, the main proportion indicator here is the hips/legs, which are proportionally equivalent between Rigby and Mordecai, and their height, which is obviously different. But we have a tag for size differences, and that tag certainly shouldn't imply young.
BushyTailHugger
MemberMods, unlock the young tags. Rigby is a short stack at best. “Tag What You See” isn’t a golden standard because art and what you see is subjective. This style makes them look the same age with a source-accurate height difference, as the user base seems to agree.
slushsig
MemberI keep finding your comments lol
Neu
BlockedYeah what we see is a developed young adult, but mods pick and choose what matters based on their own convenience when it comes to tag-what-you-see.
WindthorPryas
MemberAt what point do the moderators get moderated? It seems the answer is, "Rarely".
ThatFennec
MemberThey're not inconsistent at all. They consistently target specific artists
Thecatmate
MemberNah, id win
Clopping Now
Memberlmfao admins were getting torn to shreds in the following post so they locked the comments entirely. Then doubled down and retroactively tagged this post "young" as well just to rub salt in the wound.
Truly the pinnacle of consistent, unbiased internet moderation. keep it up I'm sure you'll gain our respect eventually if you just keep doing the same stuff we've berated you for without a hint of self reflection.
taking bets on how long before they lock the comments on this one too.