ඞ sus ඞ

Ara is so precious, must protecc

“Put table detail here you lazy fuck” is a bit harsh. So much other great details went into this. I even got a chuckle from the SuS Among Us.

This is gonna be a long comment section lol

🍿😋😋😋

Usb

Careful not to break the USB stick, or else your data will be corrupted.

An immediate follow up to this exact image would be greatly appreciated :))))

A sperm has 37.5 MB of DNA info.
One ejaculation transfers 15,875 GB of data, equivalent to that held on 7,500 laptops.

crestedcorvid said:
...equivalent to that held on 7,500 laptops.

What? That's only like 2gb per laptop. The most bottom of the barrel laptops come with 256gb+ hhds now. 15,875gb is like 62 laptops at most. Still an impressive number for a load of cock snot though.

dingus_inspector said:
What? That's only like 2gb per laptop. The most bottom of the barrel laptops come with 256gb+ hhds now. 15,875gb is like 62 laptops at most. Still an impressive number for a load of cock snot though.

looking back you're absolutely right lmao. i got my numbers from a source 11 years ago :P

USB-D

coomr said:
After all that has happened, have you learned nothing, have you no respect?

Y'all, what the hell happened?! I am out of the loop I guess...

crestedcorvid said:
A sperm has 37.5 MB of DNA info.
One ejaculation transfers 15,875 GB of data, equivalent to that held on 7,500 laptops.

Did you account human sperm count or horse sperm count? While obviously not a horse the dick and ballz resembles it most.

mm yes forbidden fruit give it to me mmmmrgfrgfghgfhncnonom

someonelseonthissite said:
Y'all, what the hell happened?! I am out of the loop I guess...

Ara is Fluff's OC and he has said that he will never draw Ara having sex. He doesnt like it. However he will never srop people from doing what they want with Ara. Lots of troglodytes forget he said that last part so they attack BC cuz of it.

Good transfer

crestedcorvid said:
A sperm has 37.5 MB of DNA info.
One ejaculation transfers 15,875 GB of data, equivalent to that held on 7,500 laptops.

Who tf has a laptop with only 2GB of data?

tredfg543 said:
After the blowback the last time butterchalk lewded Ara, I'm surprised he's going at it again.

I'm not complaining, I'm just surprised.

"As most have said, I don't promote hardcore ARA porn, or ask for it, but I won't actively stop it or lose my mind.

In all honesty, Bchalk's art is fantastic, the quality, detail, forms, movement are always great. Even if it's a subject I don't really do, I can still tell the appreciation for the characters by how well they're done, referenced, and kept as in-character as possible, given the situation. It would be a lot more bothersome to me if it was ARA in some hotel room fucking a random furry/stranger. This, at least, keeps her in setting and character as much as 'would be' if it were to happen, if that makes sense"

That's from Fluff himself. The "blowback" is manufactured outrage from people who can't or wont comprehend what Fluff himself has said about his characters, and instead try to flame the artist instead of using the blacklist.

That's a very well-hidden a moongoose.

IndexError: single positional indexer is out-of-bounds.

bobbers said:
Who tf has a laptop with only 2GB of data?

he is a traveler from the past, i remember when a few MB on a pc was alot

coomr said:
After all that has happened, have you learned nothing, have you no respect?

coomr said:
After all that has happened, have you learned nothing, have you no respect?

Apparently you haven't. Not sure how many times it'll take you to understand that while Fluff won't do or promote Ara getting fucked, he's not going to stop others from doing so. So just blacklist the artist and move on.

There is a significant amount of unnecessary data in human DNA.But the data it emits must have been improved and should become very small(Translators may have some ambiguity)

hopefully this won't lead to integer overflow

ziguanglong said:
There is a significant amount of unnecessary data in human DNA.But the data it emits must have been improved and should become very small(Translators may have some ambiguity)

We can't say if it's unnecessary because we don't know what it does. It probably isn't though, considering it's still there after billions of years of evolution.

wlkwos said:
We can't say if it's unnecessary because we don't know what it does. It probably isn't though, considering it's still there after billions of years of evolution.

There is actually a lot of interesting theories that some dna is evolution persistent because it reinforces its own existence, such as directing a protein to copy and paste itself just often enough to not significantly impact the health of the organism. Almost like a parasite condensed to a single gene. I suppose this is still DNA that does something and there for is "data" though.

However, because chains like this, left over virus dna implants, and other "filler" dna repeats significantly, the genome of an organism is likely capable of significant lossless data compression, and don't contribute to the health of the host (which can be interpreted as "being useless"). How much is probably very species and partly individual dependent.

Tl;dr we do know what a lot of it does and evolution makes a lot of detours.