vealck said:
It's 'drawn' not 'drawed'.

Unless it's supposed to be a reference to lolcat grammar or something.

Its the internet. Best to assume all bad grammar is intentional. You'll go crazy otherwise.

best logic there is, dragons are best

"PORN LOL"

Dragons: putting the "best" in bestiality.

If only best was real...;-;

Imuthes said:
Dragons: putting the "best" in bestiality.

You, sir, have just won the internet.

Thyne said:
Its the internet. Best to assume all bad grammar is intentional. You'll go crazy otherwise.

way ahead of you there, vealck.. waiting for dragon egg to hatch right now!

.. veal tasty baby cow...

DahRavager said:
Too bad most of yall are still on 'Good' lmao

On a site filled with furry porn and little otherwise? What told you that? No, really, what a genius statement.

DahRavager said:
Too bad most of yall are still on 'Good' lmao

Jokes on you, thanks to genetic engineering I'm on "Best"

I totally agree with this picture :P

Alternatively, a cyber-threesome with your ladies of differing species.

Can someone ask him to do a canine please? that way i can put this on a shirt and have one made for every day of the week? thanks.

The added text is in the same font as a lot of the TF2 text.
Hmm.

sergal239 said:
Can someone ask him to do a canine please? that way i can put this on a shirt and have one made for every day of the week? thanks.

The dragon is what makes this work.

If you put a dog, that implies you like fucking dogs (which, unlike dragons, are actually real). I mean... That's cool and all if that's what you're into but you probably don't want to publicly advertise that fact about yourself.

Um... I know the difference and never did I specify one or the other, if you'll re-read my reply. I'm not even judging you so please get off of your soapbox.

Regardless of your personal categorization, having actual physical sexual relations with any living thing that isn't human is typically regarded with massive social stigma. It's one of those situations where, if you're doing it, nobody wants to know about it. Basically, publicly broadcasting that aspect of your sexuality might not be the best idea.

Do what you want though, it's your life. I don't care.

sergal239 said:
I am not afraid of who i am! i am not going to pretend to be someone i am not! there is nothing wrong with zoophilia, or at the very least nothing wrong with me! the diffrince between being a zoo and a beast is that a beast is sexual, and abusive. being a zoo and emotional and loving! i and many others have seen cases where people with zoophilia actually take far better care of there pets than those who dont because they see them as equals not, objects to be owned. we do not tie them up! we do not hurt them! and if you say they cannot give consent i ask you this, if they do not try to get away, and they like it. what is wrong with it? we dont seem to think twice when we train them from birth to sniff out bombs, or run at guys with guns. so how is... pleasuring them. so bad? i will take any questions any of you have and answer them and tell you why zoophilia is not like that. i want to change minds about this. if you think every person who loves animals in that way is abusive, then you are no better than the humans who think all furries like to have sex in fur suits. think about that.

Jump to conclusions get offended, crash and burn. Get up slowly brush of ash and char, act like nothing happened.

"7.8/10"TooMuchPorn"":/user/show/207615 said:
pokemon = The REAL best one! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

who needs a dragon?

Dragon-types, yo.

I never thought people would get this mad over a picture that took 10 minutes to make.

sergal239 said:
Can someone ask him to do a canine please? that way i can put this on a shirt and have one made for every day of the week? thanks.

You could ask me yourself but I won't do it for the reasons LocketRauncher said.

NopeDopeForSlope said:
The added text is in the same font as a lot of the TF2 text.
Hmm.

I use the TF2 font to sign my art.

mercrantos said:
You could ask me yourself but I won't do it for the reasons LocketRauncher said.

Swap the dragon for a cat, and replace "Best" with "A cat is fine too". Instant win.

Dunnno said:
Swap the dragon for a cat, and replace "Best" with "A cat is fine too". Instant win.

But then it's just the original meme I stole this idea from.

DahRavager said:
Too bad most of yall are still on 'Good' lmao

nope im still on best
just wait til someone makes on with a bigger dragon

Best here too.

mercrantos said:
I never thought people would get this mad over a picture that took 10 minutes to make.

You could ask me yourself but I won't do it for the reasons LocketRauncher said.

I use the TF2 font to sign my art.

TF2 is a good game!

sergal239 said:
I am not afraid of who i am! i am not going to pretend to be someone i am not! there is nothing wrong with zoophilia, or at the very least nothing wrong with me! the diffrince between being a zoo and a beast is that a beast is sexual, and abusive. being a zoo and emotional and loving! i and many others have seen cases where people with zoophilia actually take far better care of there pets than those who dont because they see them as equals not, objects to be owned. we do not tie them up! we do not hurt them! and if you say they cannot give consent i ask you this, if they do not try to get away, and they like it. what is wrong with it? we dont seem to think twice when we train them from birth to sniff out bombs, or run at guys with guns. so how is... pleasuring them. so bad? i will take any questions any of you have and answer them and tell you why zoophilia is not like that. i want to change minds about this. if you think every person who loves animals in that way is abusive, then you are no better than the humans who think all furries like to have sex in fur suits. think about that.

Eh most of it stems from religious baloney anyway.

Bad dragon xD ?

may as well swap the first two as most people on this site are already halfway to the third.

Hey, give the geneticists some time and we might see #3 become a reality. I think that'd be heaven for almost everyone here. ^^

I mean... he's not wrong.

Undoubtedly

This is true.

LeoHKepler said:
Hey, give the geneticists some time and we might see #3 become a reality. I think that'd be heaven for almost everyone here. ^^

Very. Fùcking. True. (ΦωΦ)

I agree with this

sergal239 said:
I am not afraid of who i am! i am not going to pretend to be someone i am not! there is nothing wrong with zoophilia, or at the very least nothing wrong with me! the diffrince between being a zoo and a beast is that a beast is sexual, and abusive. being a zoo and emotional and loving! i and many others have seen cases where people with zoophilia actually take far better care of there pets than those who dont because they see them as equals not, objects to be owned. we do not tie them up! we do not hurt them! and if you say they cannot give consent i ask you this, if they do not try to get away, and they like it. what is wrong with it? we dont seem to think twice when we train them from birth to sniff out bombs, or run at guys with guns. so how is... pleasuring them. so bad? i will take any questions any of you have and answer them and tell you why zoophilia is not like that. i want to change minds about this. if you think every person who loves animals in that way is abusive, then you are no better than the humans who think all furries like to have sex in fur suits. think about that.

lol

♥

You guys should watch I am Dragon, it's Russian movie on Amazon prime. Not sure if any point in marking spoilers...
If someone's a beasty and you fall in love with them, doesn't mean you only love them as human, you love them for who they are! (although same thing with Ookami Kodomo)(also jab at Twilight "You only like me as a wolf" well you are more cuddlier and cute)
(I remembered this picture (and another) as I made a best in bestiality joke, it comes up too often whenever there's an occasion of love interest=beast thing, beast thing is hot, too D:)

DahRavager said:
Too bad most of yall are still on 'Good' lmao

Jokes on you! Thanks to my awkwardness, lack of social skills and mild autism I am still on horrible!

At the first you need a dragon.

Puts the "best" in bestiality?

leohkepler said:
Hey, give the geneticists some time and we might see #3 become a reality. I think that'd be heaven for almost everyone here. ^^

And then it becomes Jurassic Park/World but a million times worse, and all humans will die.

mintydino said:
If only best was real...;-;

Dragons are real, just from another universe and traveled here by accident.

sergal239 said:
I am not afraid of who i am! i am not going to pretend to be someone i am not! there is nothing wrong with zoophilia, or at the very least nothing wrong with me! the diffrince between being a zoo and a beast is that a beast is sexual, and abusive. being a zoo and emotional and loving! i and many others have seen cases where people with zoophilia actually take far better care of there pets than those who dont because they see them as equals not, objects to be owned. we do not tie them up! we do not hurt them! and if you say they cannot give consent i ask you this, if they do not try to get away, and they like it. what is wrong with it? we dont seem to think twice when we train them from birth to sniff out bombs, or run at guys with guns. so how is... pleasuring them. so bad? i will take any questions any of you have and answer them and tell you why zoophilia is not like that. i want to change minds about this. if you think every person who loves animals in that way is abusive, then you are no better than the humans who think all furries like to have sex in fur suits. think about that.

I thought Zoo was just looking at it and Beast was the act; am I wrong?

How to REALLY train your dragon....

Hell yeah!!!!

sergal239 said:
I am not afraid of who i am! i am not going to pretend to be someone i am not! there is nothing wrong with zoophilia, or at the very least nothing wrong with me! the diffrince between being a zoo and a beast is that a beast is sexual, and abusive. being a zoo and emotional and loving! i and many others have seen cases where people with zoophilia actually take far better care of there pets than those who dont because they see them as equals not, objects to be owned. we do not tie them up! we do not hurt them! and if you say they cannot give consent i ask you this, if they do not try to get away, and they like it. what is wrong with it? we dont seem to think twice when we train them from birth to sniff out bombs, or run at guys with guns. so how is... pleasuring them. so bad? i will take any questions any of you have and answer them and tell you why zoophilia is not like that. i want to change minds about this. if you think every person who loves animals in that way is abusive, then you are no better than the humans who think all furries like to have sex in fur suits. think about that.

There are so many things I could say to this but I think I'll just say that I'd make a pact with some extraplanar being to give 10 years of my life in order never to have seen this comment

If creature that looks like a dragon have mind it's not a zoo it's just xenophilia :) and I think it's ok