July 12th: Very important rules update: Any explicit content featuring young humans (and everything human-like) is now strictly forbidden from being uploaded. For all details, please see this thread
Adobe Flash has reached end of life, and no longer works in browsers. Please see this thread on the forum for details on how you can continue to play this file.
Keyboard shortcuts are disabled on this page because it contains flash.
Viewing sample resized to 30% of original (view original)Loading...
If this "AI vibe" is gonna mean anything even approaching something reasonable, it's gonna mean that it's been fed art like this so in a roundabout way you could kinda say that.
Why the fuck anyone would think that for this specific piece is beyond me though. The way I've seen AI these days is with often unnecesary detail and often times with artifacting around the lines because they've been fed jpegs. This piece is just very clean and to the point. Detail is there only where it needs to be and it never goes too far.
Look I love art, and I love this piece. dickspine aint right, but is part of something I've noticed.
The worst part of this AI "art" evolution has been the witchhunting. Suddenly, anyone with soft shading and top lighting is suspected of being a generator. How very sad it makes me...
dickspine said: kinda smells of AI, at least when you look at the rest of their page
I consider myself confident in being able to tell AI images apart. There's no way this is AI. First of all AI can barely do more advanced angles and positions with tons of errors. Second, almost all AI images have a similar style, and this is pretty clearly not that.
goatfuckersupreme said: I consider myself confident in being able to tell AI images apart. There's no way this is AI. First of all AI can barely do more advanced angles and positions with tons of errors. Second, almost all AI images have a similar style, and this is pretty clearly not that.
I agree till the AI have similar styles, not at all, sure the most "basic" AI has the same style, but you really can change anything about it, even use images to make it learn one style or another, tho that takes time and most artists wouldnt like their arts to be used as "samples" to AI learning
headpats4life said: mods really be wildin and deleting all the comments they dont like
your comment got hidden under the "Show all comments" button because it got voted down to -19. the system isn't rigged against you, you just echoed somebody else's unfounded accusation and people voted the same way they did the first time.
You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
dafloofycaptain
Memberthe hell are you smoking my guy?
Otters In Guitars
MemberRatio'd
Humerus Boner
MemberIf this "AI vibe" is gonna mean anything even approaching something reasonable, it's gonna mean that it's been fed art like this so in a roundabout way you could kinda say that.
Why the fuck anyone would think that for this specific piece is beyond me though.
The way I've seen AI these days is with often unnecesary detail and often times with artifacting around the lines because they've been fed jpegs.
This piece is just very clean and to the point.
Detail is there only where it needs to be and it never goes too far.
These are not the droids you are looking for
MrDoodles
MemberThe rest of the page as in the wooden floor?
007Delta
MemberBlud is mad he can’t draw ☠️☠️☠️🗿🗿🗿🗿
BigJazz
MemberLook I love art, and I love this piece. dickspine aint right, but is part of something I've noticed.
The worst part of this AI "art" evolution has been the witchhunting. Suddenly, anyone with soft shading and top lighting is suspected of being a generator. How very sad it makes me...
goatfuckersupreme
MemberI consider myself confident in being able to tell AI images apart. There's no way this is AI. First of all AI can barely do more advanced angles and positions with tons of errors. Second, almost all AI images have a similar style, and this is pretty clearly not that.
Kazuki Ken
MemberI love Kobold's.
quibe
MemberI agree till the AI have similar styles, not at all, sure the most "basic" AI has the same style, but you really can change anything about it, even use images to make it learn one style or another, tho that takes time and most artists wouldnt like their arts to be used as "samples" to AI learning
Lafcadio
Janitordid covid damage your sense of smell
Foxify Draws
MemberI love the character, please, upload more from her :D
headpats4life
Membermods really be wildin and deleting all the comments they dont like
Rollas
MemberSomeone got some bad puff
Lafcadio
Janitoryour comment got hidden under the "Show all comments" button because it got voted down to -19.
the system isn't rigged against you, you just echoed somebody else's unfounded accusation and people voted the same way they did the first time.
Haoss
MemberShe's got so many belts you'd think she was a guilty gear character. XD
Wils00n
Membermy eyes can't stand such perfection 😵
Login to respond »