News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

created by mavrickzoo
Viewing sample resized to 85% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted (0)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • anicebee said:
    Sadly, there's no tag for posts making pro-zoophilic arguments to blacklist.

    How about a "politics" tag? Or "inflammatory"? Either one sounds like a great thing to keep out of my headspace when I'm trying to fap.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • k9boi said:
    How about a "politics" tag? Or "inflammatory"? Either one sounds like a great thing to keep out of my headspace when I'm trying to fap.

    There's already a politics tag, but it doesn't really fit with ethical arguments like this. inflammatory would probably be far too broad to be tagged consistently.

    Though, there's zoophilia pride colors, which should clear out most of this sort of content from your experience.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • anicebee said:
    There's already a politics tag, but it doesn't really fit with ethical arguments like this. inflammatory would probably be far to broad to be tagged consistently.

    Though, there's zoophilia pride colors, which should clear out most of this sort of content from your experience.

    THEY HAVE PRIDE COLORS?! Noah! Get the damn boat we got to start over again!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • anicebee said:
    There's already a politics tag, but it doesn't really fit with ethical arguments like this. inflammatory would probably be far too broad to be tagged consistently.

    Though, there's zoophilia pride colors, which should clear out most of this sort of content from your experience.

    It's infrequent enough that perhaps blacklisting the artist themselves is the way to go? At least, I haven't run into a lot of posts that are blatantly pro-zoophilia.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • himbianagrande said:
    “Bruh” all you want.

    Echo chambers are not a good thing. Don’t believe me? Ask bluesky mods.

    Being against Zoophilia does not make an echo chamber. It's basic human decency.
    "Everyone's here is against murder? Pfff, what an echo chamber."

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Pro real life zoophilia arguments aside, and just taking this as a picture on its own, it's pretty sad. I feel bad for the poor boy. Let him be with his love.

    (Again, purely fantasy. This can really harm an animal in real life.)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.