the fuck

Pretty sure this is ai assisted

deunicus said:
Pretty sure this is ai assisted

your pfp is a good reaction to that information

deunicus said:
Pretty sure this is ai assisted

HiveModeration says it is testing to be 88.6% AI work. I would be curious to know how this got posted to FA with their anti-AI policy. There are other tests we can do to find out for sure, but first pass test raises suspicion

The Red, Blue, and Green channels do have a different appearance though.

AI assisted or not, this is pretty damn good nonetheless.

Artist was posting stuff close to this level in lighting composition 6 years ago well before A.I. so it's really hard to say. ...It's just odd that they have so few contributions overall to gauge it by (and fairly inconsistent knee joint anatomy)

I see nothing in this picture that is better explained by AI than it being hand drawn, and until anyone else can point to such a discrepancy, or if you don’t know how to tell, you shouldn’t be accusing an artist of using AI.

Willing to be proven wrong though, maybe I genuinely missed something

adleisio said:
HiveModeration says it is testing to be 88.6% AI work. I would be curious to know how this got posted to FA with their anti-AI policy. There are other tests we can do to find out for sure, but first pass test raises suspicion

The Red, Blue, and Green channels do have a different appearance though.

From what i know most of the sites and programs that are used to test for something being AI are pretty much useless since they usually have a high percentage of being completely wrong

heroic said:
You're trying to be derogatory and snide to puff yourself up, but this is really the fatal weakness of the performative anti-AI hivemind. At the end of the day, it really is all just images. If the image is of sufficient quality, the rest is just semantics. Useless psychological hangups. Strangers trying to control other strangers on the internet by posting empty words. Why spend days or weeks producing a single high-fidelity asset, when machine tools allow you to just produce more cool shit faster with less input cost?

Of course, this "discussion" is pointless, people have drawn their battle lines and won't change their minds - but ultimately, I think the hardliners are just going to get outpaced and left behind. The tools are already ludicrously powerful and getting better exponentially, and doing things purely by hand is just too taxing. Humans are smart like that. We make cool shit which allows us to make more cool shit better. But you won't understand that in your lifetime. You'll just have to be left behind.

Ok 👌

Hmmn

heroic said:
[sephiroth ass speech]

✏️

Pick it up

rykan said:
the fuck

We deserve.

Waow.

It wouldn't surprise me if some artists would decide to draw in a style an AI would, just to troll people.
Hell, afaik modern AI is getting worse! Probably because AI made content is accidentally fed to the AIs, as no human or program can detect that stuff accurately anymore. Not to mention AI poisoning tools, like Nightshade and Glaze, that could also have had an effect on them!

I doubt this is ai tbh… not much to indicate that

Watch it be that the dataset the ai's are pulling from is actually this users art 😂.

Exceedingly unlikely to be AI. If AI was used at all, which it probably wasn't, this is a full paintover, or an extremely high effort pic with maximal attention to detail. The specific patterns of lines, colors, and shading seen throughout this pic are very difficult to replicate, even with a model trained on an artist's style - and they are consistent throughout the image.

drawswhenhungry said:
Exceedingly unlikely to be AI. If AI was used at all, which it probably wasn't, this is a full paintover, or an extremely high effort pic with maximal attention to detail. The specific patterns of lines, colors, and shading seen throughout this pic are very difficult to replicate, even with a model trained on an artist's style - and they are consistent throughout the image.

Given another recent post by this artist, I am no longer sure about this. This pic has been VERY thoroughly corrected and repainted if AI was used.

heroic said:
You're trying to be derogatory and snide to puff yourself up, but this is really the fatal weakness of the performative anti-AI hivemind. At the end of the day, it really is all just images. If the image is of sufficient quality, the rest is just semantics. Useless psychological hangups. Strangers trying to control other strangers on the internet by posting empty words. Why spend days or weeks producing a single high-fidelity asset, when machine tools allow you to just produce more cool shit faster with less input cost?

Of course, this "discussion" is pointless, people have drawn their battle lines and won't change their minds - but ultimately, I think the hardliners are just going to get outpaced and left behind. The tools are already ludicrously powerful and getting better exponentially, and doing things purely by hand is just too taxing. Humans are smart like that. We make cool shit which allows us to make more cool shit better. But you won't understand that in your lifetime. You'll just have to be left behind.

Because using AI to create drawings instead of humans making it kills the whole purpose of art. Art is about the limitless possibilities of human imagination, not cold calculations made by a machine. But to quote you (which ironically describes your mindset perfectly), "You won't understand that in your lifetime"