sketchkat and tiggie created by third-party edit and wolfy-nail
Viewing sample resized to 73% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #444526 (learn more) show »
Description

Another edit of https://e621.net/post/show/465768 (by belac1), now without breasts.
Edited by saint_lum (me).

  • Comments
  • mrox said:
    That angle doesn't work well for males.

    PRDX4 said:
    Yeah, either "he" has a giant penis, or it's attached wrong.

    H

    icearticuno said:
    Could be a male-herm?

    Hey y'all! Original editor here! The original edit (i.e., the placement of the penis) was in fact intended to create a herm. Turning it into a male was not in the original plan. Also, it was one of my first ever edits, so yeah, I'll admit the anatomy isn't perfect.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Also, if anyone could give me a source, that would be cool, I'd be interested in getting in touch with the person who edited it further.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • CamKitty said:
    Editing a pic does not give you artist cred in the tags, stop that

    why not btw?
    i mean its not like its very easy and it'd be usefull so you can search for the editor/artist to find more edits.
    just sayin.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Domny said:
    why not btw?
    i mean its not like its very easy and it'd be usefull so you can search for the editor/artist to find more edits.
    just sayin.

    thanks, dude. Also, like, I'm not the one giving myself artist cred. I put a lot of work into this edit, but I'm not trying to make a big deal out of myself.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • belac1 said:
    thanks, dude. Also, like, I'm not the one giving myself artist cred. I put a lot of work into this edit, but I'm not trying to make a big deal out of myself.

    I don't think there's anything against mentioning yourself in the description. Somebody kindly let me know me if editors like our friend belac1 cannot do this. thank.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • belac1 said:
    Also, if anyone could give me a source, that would be cool, I'd be interested in getting in touch with the person who edited it further.

    Hi, that'll be me. Sorry for not answering, I haven't really been active on e621.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Also it was supposed to be "for real"-genderbent, however I, at the time of editing, had neither the tools nor the skills to move the penis. I probably didn't even notice the weird angle and position of the lynx.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0