Topic: Tag Implication: greaves_&_bracers -> armor

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

chdgs

Privileged

I'm sure you meant to have greaves & bracers implicate to armor as separate tags, not greaves_&_bracers as a single tag. Heh.

There are a handful of instances where bracers and greaves are arguably worn as a fashion accessory as opposed to as a piece of armor. In which case, images like these should also bear the unconvincing_armor tag to go with the implicated armor tag due to the bracers. (Side note: Just about every image of Krystal in her tribal outfit are in need of the unconvincing_armor tag.)
post #631762 post #306741 post #199127

Though worn decoratively, they still are very-much a piece of armor and could be used as such. In addition to how few examples of "non-armor" bracers there are, I guess this might not pose as too big of an issue.

But there were/are some instances where the bracers tag wasn't used properly and it would've erroneously implied armor.

https://e621.net/post_tag_history/index?post_id=537769
https://e621.net/post_tag_history/index?post_id=639760

Updated by anonymous

user 59725

Member

Based on what is already implicated, this seems fine. I've approved both.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1