Implicating persian → feline
Link to implication

Reason:

persian's Wiki Says That.



Denied because we don't implication pokémon to species.

parasprite said:
Denied because we don't implication pokémon to species.

I have to ask why not? I said something about this over in forum #168167 , where someone blacklisting or searching for very broad species like dragon or feline would want pokemon that resemble such creatures to be included in those results as well.

Kida said:
I have to ask why not? I said something about this over in forum #168167 , where someone blacklisting or searching for very broad species like dragon or feline would want pokemon that resemble such creatures to be included in those results as well.

post #449857

For this reason.

Clawdragons said:
post #449857

For this reason.

It's always the ponies, isn't it...

Kida said:
It's always the ponies, isn't it...

Yep. Damn Rule 34.2.

Actually no. Not always.

post #660366 post #218251

You can always tag pokemon with their family species, like canines, feline, avian, reptile, etc. But implications won't work as for the reasons shown above.

I wonder what e621's Iranian members would have to say on the subject ...

Sharp_Coyote said:
I wonder what e621's Iranian members would have to say on the subject ...

One made the thread, after all.

Sharp_Coyote said:
I wonder what e621's Iranian members would have to say on the subject ...

Ratte said:
One made the thread, after all.

I like that little pinch of irony, there.