Regarding *_expansion, *_growth and *_inflation, is there any difference between them or is it just something that has happened naturally? Do we want all three? Is one preferred over the other? Not a very big problem, but would be nice with some consistency, figured that since breast_expansion is pretty well established (and has already been aliased with both breast_inflation and breast_growth) it would be best to go with that wording?

The only thing I feel wouldn't fit would be growth, as I guess there's macro/micro(ish) stuff in there as well as other general, non-inflation, stuff.

This is the structure we got at the moment:

• breast_expansion (828)
• expansion (210)
• growth (850)
• inflation (3411)
• belly_expansion (92)
• cum_inflation (2236)

Suggest adding the following aliases:

• cock_growth -> penis_expansion
• penis_growth -> penis_expansion
• cock_inflation -> penis_expansion
• ball_growth -> balls_expansion
• butt_growth -> butt_expansion
• ass_growth -> butt_expansion
• muscle_growth -> muscle_expansion
• muscle_inflation -> muscle_expansion
• belly_inflation -> belly_expansion
• expansion -> inflation
• (growth -> inflation)

With a structure similar to:

• growth?
• inflation (seems to be the commonly accepted term)
• belly_expansion
• cum_inflation
• breast_expansion
• penis_expansion
• balls_expansion
• butt_expansion
• muscle_expansion
• belly_expansion

I'm probably over-simplifying, but it's just a thought. I don't really care much what term to use either as long as there is structure.

I think *_growth for the "I drank a potion now I have hyper everything" posts and *_inflation for when it's done with helium/cum/willing participants/golf balls (except for probably stuffing, because that's kind of a different thing—though, an implication to inflation might almost work).

My reasoning is that expansion and inflation as words kind of overlap a bit too much to rely on them being tagged correctly, but growth doesn't have this issue (at least not as bad).

Placeholder made