So every once in a while I come across images which involve cock_vore or tentacles where one's ballsack is either forcefully or voluntarely invaded by objects or characters.

I think there should be a tag for this. Something that would commonly apply to the following 3 examples:

post #354408 post #531733 post #470173

ball_invading
scrotum_a_multipurpose_container
..
or something like that?

Edit: It was decided on inside_balls

#juste621things

Edit: The best I could think of was inside_balls or inside_scrotum, but they both run the same problem of being overly specific enough to exclude each other. There really isn't a way that I can think of to say "inside_balls_or_scrotum" while keeping it short, sweet, and to the point.

I'm leaning towards inside_balls over anything else. I figure I doubt there are more than 50 images of it on here and if someone wants to see inside testicles instead of just inside the scrotum, this definitely narrows their search down quite a bit.

How about "anatomically_incorrect".

How about scrotum_insertion, would that work?

ETA: I think Parasrpite's idea of calling it inside_balls might also work. It also would be a little more user-friendly than "scrotum" is as far as words go. The only potential issue I could see is if people start mistaking it as being for an internal view of the balls instead of 'a person or object inside of the balls and/or scrotum'. But I don't know if anyone's going to make that mistake or not.

Does anyone have a preference?

Halite said:
How about "anatomically_incorrect".

I would think "lol_furry" might narrow down results a bit.

furrypickle said:
How about scrotum_insertion, would that work?

ETA: I think Parasrpite's idea of calling it inside_balls might also work. It also would be a little more user-friendly than "scrotum" is as far as words go. The only potential issue I could see is if people start mistaking it as being for an internal view of the balls instead of 'a person or object inside of the balls and/or scrotum'. But I don't know if anyone's going to make that mistake or not.

Does anyone have a preference?

Either way, it would narrow down the search results for people that want it. There are only a handful of tags specific to the balls (balls/big_balls/balls_on_face, backsack, castration, eunuch, scrotum_piercing) and none of them narrow down search results. I think going by process of elimination it would make the most sense to at least use the word "balls" in it.

Then again, outside of trying to find a particular picture I came across where the balls were depicted as being a giant empty shell filled with flowing cum, I don't really search for this sort of thing, so there may be something obvious I'm missing.

Isn't there already a vore tag for that?

Ko-san said:
Isn't there already a vore tag for that?

Yup but I think it's not specific enough for people looking for this kind of fetish.

parasprite said:
...outside of trying to find a particular picture I came across where the balls were depicted as being a giant empty shell filled with flowing cum...

My curiosity has officially been piqued now. Do you still have the link? I kind of want to see this picture now.

Ko-san said:
Isn't there already a vore tag for that?

You're probably thinking of the cock_vore tag. And while it is related, it's not the same thing. The middle example in OP's post wouldn't be cock_vore. And some images of cock_vore where they're in the shaft and not the balls also wouldn't be the same thing as scrotum_insertion/inside_balls. So they overlap in the middle, but both have things the other tag does not include.

I suggest this_is_my_home_i_live_here_now.

furrypickle said:
My curiosity has officially been piqued now. Do you still have the link? I kind of want to see this picture now.

I can't remember which was the actual picture (if any), but after trying to look for it again, it's surprisingly common.

post #449043 post #458518 post #541039 post #142013 post #108869 post #192940 post #389933

furrypickle said:
How about scrotum_insertion, would that work?

ETA: I think Parasrpite's idea of calling it inside_balls might also work. It also would be a little more user-friendly than "scrotum" is as far as words go. The only potential issue I could see is if people start mistaking it as being for an internal view of the balls instead of 'a person or object inside of the balls and/or scrotum'. But I don't know if anyone's going to make that mistake or not.

Does anyone have a preference?

I think the word 'insertion' does not fit because no insertion is actually necesarry in this case. I think inside_balls is the closest and most simple way to describe it.

So yay, we have a name for this fetish now.

Who wants to do the tagging of all the existing posts now? :P

Delian said:
I think the word 'insertion' does not fit because no insertion is actually necesarry in this case. I think inside_balls is the closest and most simple way to describe it.

So yay, we have a name for this fetish now.

Who wants to do the tagging of all the existing posts now? :P

I already found a lot of them while looking for a post, so I know what's there. It should be pretty easy for me to go back through the cock_vore tags at least. I can't think of any other immediate way to pull them out of the crowd, but I think that would be where most of them are.

Edit: Oh god my sides...

post #468252 post #73202

Edit 2: Done. Hopefully I wasn't too overzealous.

testicular_vore?

this_is_my_home_i_live_here_now is a very close second for most appropriate

titanmelon said:
testicular_vore?

this_is_my_home_i_live_here_now is a very close second for most appropriate

This applies inside or outside of the testicles and works even when the testicles are not even present (which for some reason is more common than you'd think).

If this_is_my_home_i_live_here_now was suggested and tagged a couple years ago, it would definitely have been a well-established tag. If it wasn't so long and I was thinking practically, I would have +1'd that first because I love it.