Roguefever said:
That's not how testicles work.

well, there is an anthropomorphic animal and even a dragon in this picture. I don't think 'realistic' was what they where going for when they drew this.

shadowslick said:
well, there is an anthropomorphic animal and even a dragon in this picture. I don't think 'realistic' was what they where going for when they drew this.

Everytime one of you thinks you're clever saying shit like that...
This might shock you, but the majority of furry art does infact obey the laws of reality. Other times those laws are stretched. And then we have these rare cases where they are ignored. Vore in general is where that's expected, but vore is also where anatomy is most important. The image is often largely about the innards. And if the artist does that wrong, they deserve to be told.

DemiGreyPup said:
if you want slightly more realistic anatomy, long blue claw makes it go to the bladder instead of the testicles, but he does it in a freaky wierd way anyways. due to the...eh...long claws

I hate that he is the one single artist in the fandom to care about penis anatomy. The claws are sadly not something I can ignore in his art.

Minus said:
Everytime one of you thinks you're clever saying shit like that...
This might shock you, but the majority of furry art does infact obey the laws of reality. Other times those laws are stretched. And then we have these rare cases where they are ignored. Vore in general is where that's expected, but vore is also where anatomy is most important. The image is often largely about the innards. And if the artist does that wrong, they deserve to be told.

I hate that he is the one single artist in the fandom to care about penis anatomy. The claws are sadly not something I can ignore in his art.

Ever just ask yourself.. why do you have to complain about it?
Why not just ignore it and let people enjoy it? Instead of trying to complain about the smallest stuff. So what if it doesn't follow anatomy? Do you /have/ to be right a bit this small, insignificant detail for a porn picture?

I mean come on, it's anthro animals inserting one another into their dicks, but you draw the line at anatomy problems?

People will just complain and try to look right about anything nowadays.

PointTheDergan said:
Ever just ask yourself.. why do you have to complain about it?
Why not just ignore it and let people enjoy it? Instead of trying to complain about the smallest stuff. So what if it doesn't follow anatomy? Do you /have/ to be right a bit this small, insignificant detail for a porn picture?

I mean come on, it's anthro animals inserting one another into their dicks, but you draw the line at anatomy problems?

People will just complain and try to look right about anything nowadays.

You are so clueless. It's not about us being right, it's about artist's being wrong. Having hollow testicals is VERY far from a minor detail. Hell people get madly pissed off from seeing humans dicks put on furries often, but that is a smaller issue. Still an important one though, as this is.
Are you really so unable to understand why bad internal anatomy would bother vore fans? This shouldn't even need mentioning. Once artists start making cock-vore properly, we wont need to complain. There's nothing out there for us though. Just 1 artist with a thing for claws.

Its not the artists fault here people! Blame the people who commission for this stuff. They are the real sickos who hate Anatomy!

For the douche bags complaining about anatomy here:
NEWS FLASH this is the internet, shut up and deal with it, or go away and draw your own!

Minus said:
You are so clueless. It's not about us being right, it's about artist's being wrong. Having hollow testicals is VERY far from a minor detail. Hell people get madly pissed off from seeing humans dicks put on furries often, but that is a smaller issue. Still an important one though, as this is.
Are you really so unable to understand why bad internal anatomy would bother vore fans? This shouldn't even need mentioning. Once artists start making cock-vore properly, we wont need to complain. There's nothing out there for us though. Just 1 artist with a thing for claws.

Ok... for starts, they are not "so clueless".
Vore is a FANTASY FETISH, and therefore does not have to follow the laws of Physics OR Biology, and when you say "Once artists start making cock-vore properly" you do realise that cock vore is NOT a real life thing? and that it's not physically possible?

So why the fuck are you arguing about this being "wrong" or "incorrect"? when actually there are no rules for it to follow?
This is a FANTASY FETISH that people are trying to enjoy, but dickheads like you turn up, argue with what you see, then argue with other people about everything they say just because they disagree with your "everything should be how I want it" attitude.

If you can't stand the fact that other people can have a different opinion to you, then FUCK OFF and go bother someone else

Minus said:
You are so clueless. It's not about us being right, it's about artist's being wrong. Having hollow testicals is VERY far from a minor detail. Hell people get madly pissed off from seeing humans dicks put on furries often, but that is a smaller issue. Still an important one though, as this is.
Are you really so unable to understand why bad internal anatomy would bother vore fans? This shouldn't even need mentioning. Once artists start making cock-vore properly, we wont need to complain. There's nothing out there for us though. Just 1 artist with a thing for claws.

I hate humanoid dicks on animals.
Disgusting.

4channyGranny said:
I hate humanoid dicks on animals.
Disgusting.

Especially human animals... *shudders*

SparkyTheWolf said:
Ok... for starts, they are not "so clueless".
Vore is a FANTASY FETISH, and therefore does not have to follow the laws of Physics OR Biology, and when you say "Once artists start making cock-vore properly" you do realise that cock vore is NOT a real life thing? and that it's not physically possible?

So why the fuck are you arguing about this being "wrong" or "incorrect"? when actually there are no rules for it to follow?
This is a FANTASY FETISH that people are trying to enjoy, but dickheads like you turn up, argue with what you see, then argue with other people about everything they say just because they disagree with your "everything should be how I want it" attitude.

If you can't stand the fact that other people can have a different opinion to you, then FUCK OFF and go bother someone else

I wish you idiots could see how hypocritical and selfish you are! I don't want all vore to be the way I think it should be. I want AT LEAST ONE SINGLE VORE PICTURE done the way I want. There are several of us just WAITING for someone to do realistic cock vore. Do you know how many cock-vore images are done the way YOU like them to be? 100% of them. You are the one that is refusing to allow others to enjoy this fetish, trying to make me feel like scum for having the different opinion. I refuse to be bullied by the likes of you.

Guess I'll see you lot later, on another cockvore pic.

Minus said:
I wish you idiots could see how hypocritical and selfish you are! I don't want all vore to be the way I think it should be. I want AT LEAST ONE SINGLE VORE PICTURE done the way I want. There are several of us just WAITING for someone to do realistic cock vore. Do you know how many cock-vore images are done the way YOU like them to be? 100% of them. You are the one that is refusing to allow others to enjoy this fetish, trying to make me feel like scum for having the different opinion. I refuse to be bullied by the likes of you.

Guess I'll see you lot later, on another cockvore pic.

Nobody is bullying you, you are complaining about this artist's anatomy style, and it's pissing everyone else off. As far as I can tell, you are the only person who seems to think there is a "wrong" way to draw cockvore. If you have such a problem with it, stop complaining about this art that you didn't have to ask or pay for, and commission an artist to draw it the way YOU like it. Until then, SHUT UP!

shadowslick said:
well, there is an anthropomorphic animal and even a dragon in this picture. I don't think 'realistic' was what they where going for when they drew this.

Most people just say "Furry Logic"

Minus said:
I wish you idiots could see how hypocritical and selfish you are! I don't want all vore to be the way I think it should be. I want AT LEAST ONE SINGLE VORE PICTURE done the way I want. There are several of us just WAITING for someone to do realistic cock vore. Do you know how many cock-vore images are done the way YOU like them to be? 100% of them. You are the one that is refusing to allow others to enjoy this fetish, trying to make me feel like scum for having the different opinion. I refuse to be bullied by the likes of you.

Guess I'll see you lot later, on another cockvore pic.

I know this is from... Well... 3 years ago, but I'm having trouble holding in my thoughts. Minus, to be honest, I don't think a single person cares about how you want "realistic" cock vore. I don't get how you're wanting that to go. Do you want them to go into the sack where the balls are, instead of them being "hollow" like they normally are? Are you wanting them to go into the bladder, like how it would happen realistically? That is a thing, too, by the way. ...Oh, and cock vore can happen. It happened accidentally. An eel. An eel made it's way down someone's cock. Unless someone wants to prove to me this was fake. (And I mean real proof)

ZoofyZoof said:

Oh and I'm not a biologist or anything so don't be expecting me to really know what you could be wanting from these.