Implicating boss_monster → monster
Link to implication
Reason:
First, it's already in the initial tag. Second, 'boss monster' specifically states that they are a specific type of monster. Therefore, monster.
Updated by user 59725
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating boss_monster → monster
Link to implication
First, it's already in the initial tag. Second, 'boss monster' specifically states that they are a specific type of monster. Therefore, monster.
Updated by user 59725
That would completely break twys.
The monster tag is for creatures that actually look monstrous. Most Undertale 'monsters' don't fit there.
...the abomination -> monster alias should probably be flipped around, to make the usage clearer.
Updated by anonymous
The boss_monster tag already skirts TWYS (see forum #177110). I think basing an implication off of it would set an unfortunate precedent.
Updated by anonymous
monster tag is supposed to be used on things that look like monsters, not on soft and gentle looking goat mommies
Updated by anonymous
Denied. The monster tag is already an unpredictable mess. I'd rather this not get diluted even further
Updated by anonymous
Besides Undertale, much of that is because of the monster_girl -> monster implication (which probably should've been unimplicated long ago). Most of the monster_girls don't actually look monstrous; if anything, they'd fit better under humanoid.
Maybe we should just wipe the whole monster tag and find replacements for it.
Tentacle_monster seems to be working pretty well for one subset of monsters.
And abomination could be kept specifically for things such as these:
post #409375 post #455861
Additionally, perhaps the humanoid category could be expanded by creating a monstrous_humanoid subtag:
post #328009 post #702664 post #800101
Much of the rest would fit better under various existing tags such as feral, combined with nightmare_fuel.
That'd cover a good chunk of it, though I'm not sure what we'd do with the leftovers. There's some creatures that can't quite be described as anything else but a generic 'monster'.
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
because of the monster_girl -> monster implication (which probably should've been unimplicated long ago).
Deleted
Genjar said:
Maybe we should just wipe the whole monster tag and find replacements for it.Tentacle_monster seems to be working pretty well for one subset of monsters.
And abomination could be kept specifically for things such as these:Additionally, perhaps the humanoid category could be expanded by creating a monstrous_humanoid subtag:
+1 for moving monster -> abomination
+1 for monstrous_humanoid
What of the generic monster girls that aren't particularly monstrous? I suppose we could stick them in monstrous_humanoid for now but temporarily leave off any implications until it's sorted through.
So something like:
Updated by anonymous
I kind of want to have a monster_(undertale) tag to just sort them all out, but "Monster" has essentially become the goto term for "Non-standard species of sapient persons," ie not elf, human, orc, dwarf, etc.
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
Deleted
Excellent. I'll get to work, starting with the clearly non-monstrous species such as centaurs.
What of the generic monster girls that aren't particularly monstrous? I suppose we could stick them in monstrous_humanoid for now but temporarily leave off any implications until it's sorted through.
If we're still keeping the monster_girl tag for now, then I think we can simply add the humanoid tag to the non-monstrous ones. It'll be easier to figure out once the other things have been cleared out a bit.
Furrin_Gok said:
I kind of want to have a monster_(undertale) tag to just sort them all out
That would probably be the only way to stop certain users from mass-tagging them simply as a 'monster'.
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
That would probably be the only way to stop certain users from mass-tagging them simply as a 'monster'.
I ran a mass edit to remove monster from boss_monster. If there are any abominations in there they can be retagged as needed.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
I kind of want to have a monster_(undertale) tag to just sort them all out, but "Monster" has essentially become the goto term for "Non-standard species of sapient persons," ie not elf, human, orc, dwarf, etc.
Genjar said:
That would probably be the only way to stop certain users from mass-tagging them simply as a 'monster'.
That would be a fitting solution, like specifying both Papyrus and Sans as animate_skeleton.
Updated by anonymous
Related:
dragon-kin was an early attempt at tagging dragon-like monster girls, before we came up with the humanoid tag. It's visually similar enough to alias to dragon_humanoid. (I couldn't submit it through the alias tool because of the existing aliases.)
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
Related:
dragon-kin was an early attempt at tagging dragon-like monster girls, before we came up with the humanoid tag. It's visually similar enough to alias to dragon_humanoid. (I couldn't submit it through the alias tool because of the existing aliases.)
I'll take care of that one now.
Updated by anonymous