Just checking: is there some actual not-obscure (i.e. used more than five times) tag that I just can't find for this?

Looks like there's been several variants, but none caught on and eventually all got wiped.

But it seems like a valid tag to me, even if nobody's been interested in tagging it.

I think another problem is people don't tag it in. Either that or how low do the pants have to be to count?
post #161331

kimjoy said:
I think another problem is people don't tag it in.

They did at one point. Now they can't.

BlueDingo said:
They did at one point. Now they can't.

That sounds ridiculously counterintuitive

kimjoy said:
I think another problem is people don't tag it in. Either that or how low do the pants have to be to count?
post #161331

To me the cleavage part implies the same as with boobs (i.e. pants_down would tend to invalidate it). Most of the instance would be of the plumber's crack anyway, which is clearly accidental. Stuff like post #1122350 would be pretty rare I assume.

Yeah, and the cleavage tags tend to be problematic. Butt_cleavage was likely tagged for butt cracks in general, regardless of the clothing. Which might be why the alias was approved.

Maybe it should be tagged as plumber's_crack... That, at least, makes the usage clearer.