Topic: Tag Implication: falala -> lalala

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The Kirby character Lalala and the Adventures of Lolo character Lala are technically the same character, but we don't seem to have any Adventures of Lolo images yet... -1 for me because:

1. This should've been an alias.
2. All versions of this character collectively have only 1 image to their name. 0 Falala, 1 Lalala and 0 Lala (well, actually 18 but none are of this character).

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
The Kirby character Lalala and the Adventures of Lolo character Lala are technically the same character, but we don't seem to have any Adventures of Lolo images yet... -1 for me because:

1. This should've been an alias.
2. All versions of this character collectively have only 1 image to their name. 0 Falala, 1 Lalala and 0 Lala (well, actually 18 but none are of this character).

I don't understand as there is an implication of "fololo -> lololo" in place.

Updated by anonymous

xchellx said:
I don't understand as there is an implication of "fololo -> lololo" in place.

I did a search, and I don't see the tag at all.

Updated by anonymous

xchellx said:
I don't understand as there is an implication of "fololo -> lololo" in place.

Neither tag has implications/aliases, I edited in your text to include the wikis fololo & lololo; and BlueDingo's second reason is correct. Furthermore, if an alias/implication existed for both, you would not have been able to make this thread as it would have shown an error message.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
Neither tag has implications/aliases, I edited in your text to include the wikis fololo & lololo, and BlueDingo's second reason is correct. Furthermore, if an alias/implication existed for both, you would not have been able to make this thread as it would have shown an error message.

It did show a error message for lololo

Updated by anonymous

xchellx said:
It did show a error message for lololo

So you are bringing a tangentially related point... because? There is no alias or implication, there is a pending one that's off topic.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1